Font size:
Print
Myanmar Crisis and ASEAN
Context:
The ongoing crisis in Myanmar, which escalated after the military coup on February 1, 2021, presents a significant challenge for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
More on News:
- The coup ousted the democratically elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi and has led to widespread violence, humanitarian crises, and a deteriorating political landscape.
- Humanitarian conditions in Myanmar have deteriorated significantly, with approximately one-third of its population requiring aid.
- Displacement due to violence has led to over 2.5 million internally displaced persons (IDPs), exacerbating an already dire situation for many families.
The Myanmar Crisis: Background and Current Situation:
- The military coup in Myanmar was a culmination of rising tensions between the National League for Democracy (NLD) and the military, known as the Tatmadaw.
- The NLD had won a landslide victory in the November 2020 elections, which prompted the military to allege electoral fraud.
- Following the coup, mass protests erupted across the country, leading to violent crackdowns by security forces.
- Reports indicate that over 6,000 people have been killed since the coup, with millions displaced internally and thousands fleeing to neighbouring countries.
- In response to the coup, a shadow government known as the National Unity Government (NUG) was formed by ousted lawmakers and ethnic leaders.
- This government has attempted to organise resistance against the military junta, leading to increased armed conflict throughout Myanmar.
- By late 2023, resistance forces had gained control of significant territories and launched operations against military outposts, further destabilising the region.
ASEAN’s Role and Challenges:
- ASEAN’s traditional principles of non-interference and consensus-based decision-making have been put to the test by the Myanmar crisis.
- Initially, ASEAN leaders convened an emergency summit in April 2021, resulting in a ‘Five-Point Consensus’ aimed at addressing the situation.
- This included calls for an immediate cessation of violence, constructive dialogue among all parties, and humanitarian assistance.
- However, ASEAN’s effectiveness has been hampered by internal divisions among member states regarding how to address the crisis.
- Countries like Thailand and Cambodia have favoured a more lenient approach towards Myanmar’s military leaders, while others like Indonesia have called for stricter measures.
- The exclusion of Myanmar’s military representatives from ASEAN meetings since 2022 reflects growing frustration with their lack of compliance with ASEAN’s consensus.
- Despite these efforts, progress has been slow.
- The ASEAN special envoy’s visits to Myanmar yielded little success in facilitating dialogue or reducing violence.
- The lack of engagement with pro-democracy groups further complicates ASEAN’s ability to mediate effectively.
International Reactions and Humanitarian Concerns:
- The international community has responded with a mix of sanctions and diplomatic efforts aimed at pressuring the junta to restore democracy.
- The United Nations Security Council expressed deep concern over human rights violations and called for an end to violence.
- However, major powers like China and India have maintained economic ties with Myanmar despite their reservations about its political situation.
Moving Forward:
To effectively address the Myanmar crisis, ASEAN must reconsider its approach:
- Inclusive Dialogue: Engage all stakeholders in negotiations, including pro-democracy groups like the NUG and ethnic armed organisations.
- Strengthen Humanitarian Efforts: Coordinate humanitarian assistance through international partnerships while ensuring aid reaches those in need without interference from military authorities.
- Reassess Non-Interference Policy: While respecting member sovereignty is important, ASEAN may need to adopt a more proactive stance that prioritises human rights and democratic governance over strict adherence to non-interference.
- Enhance Regional Cooperation: Collaborate with neighbouring countries and international organisations to address cross-border issues stemming from the crisis, such as refugee flows and drug trafficking.
Monitor Progress: Establish mechanisms for regular assessment of progress toward implementing the Five-Point Consensus and adjust strategies based on evolving conditions on the ground.
