Sanchar Saathi faces major setback concerns

  • 0
  • 3014
Font size:
Print

Sanchar Saathi faces major setback concerns

Sanchar Saathi faces major setback concerns

Context: The debate around mandatory preloading of the Sanchar Saathi app has intensified after several global smartphone makers, including Apple, refused to comply with the government’s directive. 

What is Sanchar Saathi?

  • Sanchar Saathi is a citizen-safety platform developed by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to curb mobile-related fraud. 
  • Its tools—CEIR (Central Equipment Identity Register), TAFCOP, and Know Your Mobile (KYM)—enable users to block/track lost phones using IMEI, identify all mobile connections linked to their name, verify second-hand devices, and report suspected scam calls. 
  • According to DoT data (2024–25), the platform has blocked over 10 million lost devices and helped trace more than 2 million, strengthening digital trust in telecom services.

Why was it introduced?

  • Rising digital frauds: India has seen a surge in cyber and telecom fraud complaints, with the Indian Cyber Crime Reporting Portal recording over 1 lakh digital financial fraud complaints monthly.
  • Regulatory need for device tracking: The Economic Survey 2023–24 highlighted an increase in mobile penetration to over 93%, making device security integral to citizen safety.
  • Curbing illegal mobile connections: TAFCOP was introduced after multiple cases where criminals used SIMs issued under fake identities (e.g., the 2023 pan-India fake SIM crackdown, where over 1.5 lakh illegal SIMs were deactivated).

Thus, Sanchar Saathi provides a unified, government-backed mechanism to secure devices and identity-linked mobile services.

What are the major concerns associated with it?

  • Privacy apprehensions: OEMs and civil society groups fear that mandatory preloading may lead to a perception of surveillance, even though the app collects only device information (IMEI).
  • Data security and trust deficit: With no statutory data protection architecture until the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 is fully operationalised, users remain cautious about the government’s handling of device data.
  • OEM reluctance: Global manufacturers argue that forced pre-installation violates user choice and global standards of bloatware minimisation.
  • Implementation challenges: Ensuring uniform software updates for older devices and compliance by all brands may create technical and logistical friction.


Subscribe to our Youtube Channel for more Valuable Content – TheStudyias

Download the App to Subscribe to our Courses – Thestudyias

The Source’s Authority and Ownership of the Article is Claimed By THE STUDY IAS BY MANIKANT SINGH

Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act Secures Amaravati
Next Post BRICS Bank
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Study IAS - Footer
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x