The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

Caste Census

  • 0
  • 3069
Font size:
Print

Caste Census

Context: With the census delayed until the end of 2024, there is a demand to amend the Census Act of 1948 to make caste enumeration mandatory, rather than leaving it to the discretion of the Union executive.

 

  • Census: A comprehensive 10-year process in India collecting demographic, economic, and social data. Before 1931, all castes were included hence there are calls for a 2021 socio-economic caste census.
      • Legally backed by census act 1948, and only cover data of SC/ST.
      • The subject of census is covered in the Union List under Entry 69 in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.
      • Conducted by Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, Ministry of Home Affairs.
  • Caste Census: The first socio-economic caste census in independent India was in 2011, but its findings were not published. The last comprehensive caste data was in the 1931 census.
      • No legal backing 
  • Caste Survey: Since only the Union government can conduct a census, states like Bihar and Odisha have conducted their own socio-economic caste surveys to assess the social and economic status of different castes.
      • No legal backing 

 

 

 

 

Need for caste census to include OBC’s

  • Social imperative: Caste continues to be a foundational social construct in India. Only about 5% of Indian marriages were inter-caste as of 2011-12.
      • Choices of candidates for elections and ministers for Cabinets continue to be dictated by caste considerations.
  • Constitutional imperative:For providing reservation, education and public employment e.g. Article 15(4),Article 16(4) and Article 340.
  • Administrative imperative:To include beneficiaries and eliminate ghost beneficiaries, needed for sub-categorising castes within a reserved category and to determine the income/wealth criterion for the creamy layer.
  • Moral imperative:Absence of data leads to dominant groups among OBC getting disproportionately high benefits .
  • Reservation in Local bodies: Unlike SCs and STs, OBCs lack reservations in MP and MLA constituencies but have them in panchayats and municipalities (Articles 243D(6) and 243T(6)) since the 73rd and 74th amendments (1993).
      • States like MH,UP, KN  implementing OBC reservations in local elections faced judicial stays due to the absence of this data.
  • Better targeting of Government welfare schemes:
  • Under the National Food Security Act, 83.92% of Bihar’s population is entitled to subsidised food grain.However post Bihar caste survey it was found out that 90% population needed subsidised food grain.

 

 

Argument against Caste Census

  • Socially divisive as it strengthens caste identities.
  • Administrative nightmare of conducting caste census of 4000 castes
  • Fuel demands for increased reservations:e.g. demands by Marathas, Patidars, Jats, for reservations. And thus may lead to breaching the 50% reservation cap as guided by SC in Indra Sawhney & Others vs Union of India.
      • Increased reservation may hamper efficiency of administration (Article 335)
  • Instead of focusing on a caste-based census, the government can subclassify Backward Classes, as done in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and West Bengal, to better target benefits. 
      • Justice G. Rohini Panel on Sub-categorisation of OBCs has already been appointed for this purpose.

 

 

Failed caste census of 2011

  • In 2010, Parliament resolved to include caste in the 2011 Census.
  • The 1931 Census listed 4,147 castes. 
  • However, the Socio Economic and Caste Census (SECC) of 2011 was flawed, reporting an implausible 46 lakh castes, and its results were never released. 
  • The SECC failed because it wasn’t conducted under the Census Act, 1948, and used poorly designed questionnaires by inexperienced Union Ministries.
  • In contrast, Bihar’s 2023 Caste Survey, using a list of 214 specific castes, yielded better results.
  • Despite the 2010 resolution, the Central government decided against including caste in the next Census in 2021 and upheld this before the Supreme Court in a case filed by Maharashtra. 

 

 

Way Forward

  • To avoid SECC-2011 failures, the Census Act, 1948 should be amended to mandate caste enumeration by the Census Commissioner. 
  • Caste should be included in the regular Census with a well-designed questionnaire
      • Sociological/anthropological experts should create a draft list of castes for each state. 
  • States should urge the Supreme Court to review its 2021 judgement as  relying on outdated 1931 data for OBC reservations is inadequate. 
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post ‘Uncomfortable Truth’- Workplace Culture Remains Hostile for Women
Next Post Cocktail Drugs