Revamped PDS under the Food Security Act

  • 0
  • 3167
Font size:
Print

Revamped PDS under the Food Security Act

Context:

During NFSA 2013 discussions, concerns about food security arose due to PDS inefficiencies, with 41.7% leakages reported in 2011-12 NSS data.

 

Introduction:

  • The National Food Security Act (NFSA) of 2013 raised concerns about ensuring food security through the Public Distribution System (PDS) due to its poor track record.
  • According to the National Sample Survey (NSS) 2011-12, nationwide PDS leakages were at 41.7%.
  • However, states that implemented PDS reforms experienced significant improvements.

 

Arguments for PDS Continuation:

  • State Reforms: States like Bihar, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha saw drastic reductions in PDS leakages between 2004-05 and 2011-12, with Bihar reducing leakages from 91% to 24%, Chhattisgarh from 52% to 9%, and Odisha from 76% to 25%.
  • NFSA Impact: The NFSA 2013 mandated similar reforms, fostering hope for nationwide improvements.

 

Data from Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) 2022-23:

  • The first large-scale survey post-NFSA implementation showed that PDS leakages had reduced to 22% in 2022-23.
  • The methodology for estimating leakages involved comparing household PDS purchases with “offtake” data from the Food Ministry.

 

Estimation Methodology:

  • Defining Leakages: Leakages refer to the amount of PDS rice and wheat that does not reach consumers despite being released by the Food Corporation of India (FCI).
  • Dual Checks: The survey matched PDS grain purchases by households (both paid and free) with offtake data under NFSA and PMGKAY.
  • Grain Distribution: Between August 2022 and July 2023, PDS ration card holders received NFSA grain and additional PMGKAY grain until December 2022.

 

Underestimation of Leakages:

  • Expanded PDS by States: Many states, like Chhattisgarh, provided PDS grain to non-NFSA beneficiaries using both central and state contributions, making the all-India leakage estimate of 17.6%-18.2% an underestimate.
  • State Contributions: If state contributions for non-NFSA beneficiaries are added, the all-India leakage estimate rises to 22%.

 

Impact of NFSA on PDS Coverage:

  • PDS Reforms: The NFSA 2013 expanded PDS coverage to reduce exclusion errors and improve efficiency. By 2011-12, before the NFSA, less than 50% of households had ration cards, and only about 40% accessed the PDS.
  • Improvement in Coverage: By 2022-23, 70% of households were using the PDS due to reforms in states like Chhattisgarh (where coverage tripled from 21% to 63% between 2004-05 and 2011-12).
  • Shortfall in NFSA Coverage: The Centre is still short of the NFSA mandate, which aims to cover 66% of the population (50% rural and 75% urban). 
  • Administrative data shows that only 59% have access to PDS under NFSA.

 

PDS Reforms in Early-Reforming States:

  • Key Reforms: States like Chhattisgarh and Odisha reformed their PDS by reducing prices, delivering food grains to doorsteps, digitising records, and de-privatising PDS management.
  • Reduction in Leakages: By 2011-12, early reforming states had already reduced leakages significantly. 
  • For example, HCES 2022-23 showed leakage rates of 9% in Rajasthan, 21% in Jharkhand, and 23% in Uttar Pradesh.

 

Role of Aadhaar Integration:

  • Aadhaar and PDS: Many attribute improvements in PDS to Aadhaar-based biometric authentication (ABBA). 
  • However, studies in Jharkhand (2017) showed minimal differences in purchase-entitlement ratios between offline and ABBA-using villages, indicating little impact from ABBA on reducing leakages.

 

Challenges in States with Traditionally Better PDS:

  • Unexpected Increase in Leakages: In some states with historically effective PDS systems, leakages have increased, such as in Tamil Nadu, where leakages rose from 12% in 2011-12 to 25% in 2022-23.
  • Threats to PDS: The PDS faces ongoing challenges from innovations like cash transfer experiments and Aadhaar-based systems, which could derail its success.
  • Policy Focus: Instead of pushing measures like eKYC, the government should expedite the delayed Census, which has led to the exclusion of over 100 million people. 
  • Other priorities, such as including more nutritious items like pulses and edible oils, remain relevant for improving food security.
Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Loss and Damage Fund (LDF)
Next Post Singapore and Semiconductor
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x