The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

Revamped PDS under the Food Security Act

  • 0
  • 3051
Font size:
Print

Revamped PDS under the Food Security Act

Context:

During NFSA 2013 discussions, concerns about food security arose due to PDS inefficiencies, with 41.7% leakages reported in 2011-12 NSS data.

 

Introduction:

  • The National Food Security Act (NFSA) of 2013 raised concerns about ensuring food security through the Public Distribution System (PDS) due to its poor track record.
  • According to the National Sample Survey (NSS) 2011-12, nationwide PDS leakages were at 41.7%.
  • However, states that implemented PDS reforms experienced significant improvements.

 

Arguments for PDS Continuation:

  • State Reforms: States like Bihar, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha saw drastic reductions in PDS leakages between 2004-05 and 2011-12, with Bihar reducing leakages from 91% to 24%, Chhattisgarh from 52% to 9%, and Odisha from 76% to 25%.
  • NFSA Impact: The NFSA 2013 mandated similar reforms, fostering hope for nationwide improvements.

 

Data from Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) 2022-23:

  • The first large-scale survey post-NFSA implementation showed that PDS leakages had reduced to 22% in 2022-23.
  • The methodology for estimating leakages involved comparing household PDS purchases with “offtake” data from the Food Ministry.

 

Estimation Methodology:

  • Defining Leakages: Leakages refer to the amount of PDS rice and wheat that does not reach consumers despite being released by the Food Corporation of India (FCI).
  • Dual Checks: The survey matched PDS grain purchases by households (both paid and free) with offtake data under NFSA and PMGKAY.
  • Grain Distribution: Between August 2022 and July 2023, PDS ration card holders received NFSA grain and additional PMGKAY grain until December 2022.

 

Underestimation of Leakages:

  • Expanded PDS by States: Many states, like Chhattisgarh, provided PDS grain to non-NFSA beneficiaries using both central and state contributions, making the all-India leakage estimate of 17.6%-18.2% an underestimate.
  • State Contributions: If state contributions for non-NFSA beneficiaries are added, the all-India leakage estimate rises to 22%.

 

Impact of NFSA on PDS Coverage:

  • PDS Reforms: The NFSA 2013 expanded PDS coverage to reduce exclusion errors and improve efficiency. By 2011-12, before the NFSA, less than 50% of households had ration cards, and only about 40% accessed the PDS.
  • Improvement in Coverage: By 2022-23, 70% of households were using the PDS due to reforms in states like Chhattisgarh (where coverage tripled from 21% to 63% between 2004-05 and 2011-12).
  • Shortfall in NFSA Coverage: The Centre is still short of the NFSA mandate, which aims to cover 66% of the population (50% rural and 75% urban). 
  • Administrative data shows that only 59% have access to PDS under NFSA.

 

PDS Reforms in Early-Reforming States:

  • Key Reforms: States like Chhattisgarh and Odisha reformed their PDS by reducing prices, delivering food grains to doorsteps, digitising records, and de-privatising PDS management.
  • Reduction in Leakages: By 2011-12, early reforming states had already reduced leakages significantly. 
  • For example, HCES 2022-23 showed leakage rates of 9% in Rajasthan, 21% in Jharkhand, and 23% in Uttar Pradesh.

 

Role of Aadhaar Integration:

  • Aadhaar and PDS: Many attribute improvements in PDS to Aadhaar-based biometric authentication (ABBA). 
  • However, studies in Jharkhand (2017) showed minimal differences in purchase-entitlement ratios between offline and ABBA-using villages, indicating little impact from ABBA on reducing leakages.

 

Challenges in States with Traditionally Better PDS:

  • Unexpected Increase in Leakages: In some states with historically effective PDS systems, leakages have increased, such as in Tamil Nadu, where leakages rose from 12% in 2011-12 to 25% in 2022-23.
  • Threats to PDS: The PDS faces ongoing challenges from innovations like cash transfer experiments and Aadhaar-based systems, which could derail its success.
  • Policy Focus: Instead of pushing measures like eKYC, the government should expedite the delayed Census, which has led to the exclusion of over 100 million people. 
  • Other priorities, such as including more nutritious items like pulses and edible oils, remain relevant for improving food security.
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post Happiness Committee for Judicial Officers of Kerala
Next Post Scientists Propose Guidelines for Solar Geoengineering Research