Font size:
Print
Rethinking Health Metrics: The Shift from BMI to BRI
Context:
BMI (Body Mass Index) calculators are popular online tools for quickly assessing health based on height and weight.
More on News:
- In 2022, financial services company Zerodha even incentivised employees with a bonus for maintaining a BMI under 25, highlighting the importance placed on this metric in workplace wellness.
- BMI’s accuracy has come under scrutiny, prompting the emergence of the Body Roundness Index (BRI) as a potentially more reliable alternative.
Recent Findings
- Studies suggest that BRI may better predict health risks than BMI. A 2021 study noted BRI’s superior ability to identify metabolic syndrome compared to BMI.
- A JAMA Network Open study linked BRI to all-cause mortality, suggesting a U-shaped risk curve.
The Limitations of BMI:
- BMI is calculated by dividing a person’s weight in kilograms by the square of their height in metres (m2). While it is a simple and widely used measure, BMI has several shortcomings:
- Lack of Body Composition Insight: BMI does not differentiate between muscle and fat. This means that a muscular person could be classified as overweight or obese, despite having a healthy body composition.
- Ignoring Fat Distribution: BMI does not account for where fat is distributed on the body. Abdominal fat, for example, is more closely linked to health risks than fat stored in other areas.
- One-Size-Fits-All Approach: BMI does not consider age, sex, or ethnicity, which can all influence body composition and health risks.
Introducing the Body Roundness Index (BRI):
- BRI was developed by mathematician Diana Thomas in 2013, considering body shape and waist circumference.
- This provides a more nuanced view of body composition and fat distribution.
- BRI is calculated using waist circumference and height, yielding scores from 1 to 15.
- Health risk categories: Scores above 6.9 or below 3.41 indicate higher illness risk.
- Health implications: Emphasises that fat distribution, particularly visceral fat, is critical for assessing health risks.
- Visceral fat stored around internal organs in the abdomen significantly impacts health. This type of fat is linked to metabolic syndrome and chronic diseases like type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular issues.
- Ethnic predispositions: For instance, Indians are more prone to abdominal fat accumulation.
Obesity Trends in India
- The National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5) indicates rising obesity rates, with 22.9% of men and 24% of women classified as overweight or obese.
- Wider Risk Scope: BMI may mislead people into thinking only overweight individuals are at risk. Thin individuals and children can also face significant health risks, as evidenced by high rates of abnormal blood glucose and cholesterol levels among children.
Challenges:
- Human error in measuring waist circumference can significantly affect BRI accuracy.
- Training for accurate measurement is necessary, as discrepancies can occur even among professionals.
- As a newer metric, BRI lacks the extensive historical data that supports the use of BMI, making its long-term validity still under investigation.
Conclusion:
While BRI shows promise as a more accurate measure of health compared to BMI, it is not without its challenges. As research continues, it will be important to consider both the benefits and limitations of BRI. For now, BRI offers a valuable tool for those looking to gain a more comprehensive understanding of their health.