The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

Right to Disconnect

  • 0
  • 3025
Font size:
Print

Right to Disconnect

Context:

Australia’s new “right to disconnect” law, which took effect recently, grants employees the right to decline contact from employers or third parties outside of their working hours.

 

More on News

  • Came into effect on August 26, allowing employees to refuse contact from employers or third parties outside working hours.
  • Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasised that employees should not be penalised for being unavailable outside their paid working hours.

Understanding the “Right to Disconnect”

  • Originates from the belief that technology blurs the line between work and home life, especially with remote work.
  • Belgium’s Public Administration Minister Petra De Sutter highlighted that the pandemic exacerbated the blurring of work-life boundaries, leading to stress and burnout.
  • Broader Cultural Implications: Some argue that the “right to disconnect” could be a catalyst for better work-life balance policies and a cultural shift toward less intense work environments.

 

Global Examples of the Law

  • France: Introduced the “right to disconnect” in 2017, requiring companies with over 50 employees to establish guidelines on out-of-hours communication.
  • India: Baramati MP Supriya Sule proposed the Right to Disconnect Bill in 2018, but it was not discussed in Parliament
    • The bill suggested penalties for companies that failed to comply and proposed overtime pay for work done outside regular hours.

pros and cons of right to disconnect.

Concerns and Criticisms:

  • Career Impact: Critics argue that employees who assert their right to disconnect might be passed over for promotions or key tasks.
  • Implementation Challenges: Concerns were raised about the impact on promotions and job opportunities, especially for women, as seen in debates on menstrual and maternity leaves.
  • Australia’s Chambers of Commerce: Opposed the law, citing potential negative impacts on business flexibility and women’s participation in the workforce.
  • Confusion and Application: Some find the law confusing, particularly in determining what constitutes acceptable work-related contact after hours.

 

Australia’s Approach

  • The law applies immediately to companies with over 15 employees, with smaller companies having until August 26, 2025, to comply.
  • The Fair Work Ombudsman states that employees can refuse contact unless it is deemed “unreasonable.”
  • In disputes, parties must first attempt to resolve the issue internally before escalating it to the Fair Work Commission.
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post Khelo India Scheme
Next Post Supreme Court Ruling on Relaxing Bail Provision