Right to Disconnect

  • 0
  • 3082
Font size:
Print

Right to Disconnect

Context:

Australia’s new “right to disconnect” law, which took effect recently, grants employees the right to decline contact from employers or third parties outside of their working hours.

 

More on News

  • Came into effect on August 26, allowing employees to refuse contact from employers or third parties outside working hours.
  • Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasised that employees should not be penalised for being unavailable outside their paid working hours.

Understanding the “Right to Disconnect”

  • Originates from the belief that technology blurs the line between work and home life, especially with remote work.
  • Belgium’s Public Administration Minister Petra De Sutter highlighted that the pandemic exacerbated the blurring of work-life boundaries, leading to stress and burnout.
  • Broader Cultural Implications: Some argue that the “right to disconnect” could be a catalyst for better work-life balance policies and a cultural shift toward less intense work environments.

 

Global Examples of the Law

  • France: Introduced the “right to disconnect” in 2017, requiring companies with over 50 employees to establish guidelines on out-of-hours communication.
  • India: Baramati MP Supriya Sule proposed the Right to Disconnect Bill in 2018, but it was not discussed in Parliament
    • The bill suggested penalties for companies that failed to comply and proposed overtime pay for work done outside regular hours.

Right to Disconnect

Concerns and Criticisms:

  • Career Impact: Critics argue that employees who assert their right to disconnect might be passed over for promotions or key tasks.
  • Implementation Challenges: Concerns were raised about the impact on promotions and job opportunities, especially for women, as seen in debates on menstrual and maternity leaves.
  • Australia’s Chambers of Commerce: Opposed the law, citing potential negative impacts on business flexibility and women’s participation in the workforce.
  • Confusion and Application: Some find the law confusing, particularly in determining what constitutes acceptable work-related contact after hours.

 

Australia’s Approach

  • The law applies immediately to companies with over 15 employees, with smaller companies having until August 26, 2025, to comply.
  • The Fair Work Ombudsman states that employees can refuse contact unless it is deemed “unreasonable.”
  • In disputes, parties must first attempt to resolve the issue internally before escalating it to the Fair Work Commission.
Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Supreme Court Ruling on Relaxing Bail Provision
Next Post Care Economy
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x