The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

Containing subsidies: States must Reassess and Rationalise Expenditure

  • 0
  • 3033
Font size:
Print

Containing subsidies: States must Reassess and Rationalise Expenditure

Context:

Subsidies are crucial for welfare in India, but their impact on state finances, especially post-pandemic, has raised concerns. 

  • A recent study by the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy highlighted the need for better financial management by state governments.

Factors Constraining State Finances

Factors Constraining State Finances:

  • GST Implementation: Limited state tax revenue generation post-GST implementation due to reduced taxing authority.
  • Committed Expenditures: 60-80% of state budgets (2017-2020) are tied to essential services, salaries, and interest payments, leaving little room for discretionary spending.
  • Burden of Explicit Subsidies: Explicit subsidies (financial aid, insurance, etc.) heavily strain state budgets and limit resources for infrastructure and investment.

 

Challenges in Subsidy Management:

  • Poor Targeting: Inefficient subsidy distribution.
  • Lack of Transparency: Opaque subsidy distribution and utilisation.
  • Debt Relief and Free Power Supply: Financial strain on state electricity boards due to subsidies.
  • Interest Subsidies: Further strain on state finances.

 

Fiscal Position of Indian State Governments:

  • Over-Reliance on Own Revenues: State tax revenues form about half of total revenues, and deviations in growth impact overall revenue.
  • Devolution from the Centre: 40-45% of state revenues come from central transfers, with recent years seeing higher-than-expected tax devolution.
  • Improved Tax Buoyancy: Post-2017, SGST is the primary state tax revenue source, with recent improvements in tax buoyancy.

 

Concerns in State Financial Management:

  • Significant Variation in Grants: Actual grants often vary significantly from budget estimates, particularly in Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS).
  • High Debt Issuance: States have increased borrowing, leading to potential fiscal risks.
  • Low Capital Spending: Capital spending is expected to start slowly in 2024, influenced by election timing and monsoon season.
  • Technical Inefficiency in Tax Collection: High inefficiency in collecting state taxes like stamp duty and excise duty due to complex rate structures.
  • Lack of Uniformity in Motor Vehicle Tax: Variations across states in motor vehicle tax lead to inconsistencies and revenue shortfalls.
  • Resorting to Non-Tax Revenue: States are increasingly relying on non-tax revenue measures like e-auction of mining leases.
  • Concerns Related to Cess and Surcharge: Revenue from cess and surcharge, which is not shared with states, has increased significantly.

 

Suggestions for Improving State Finances:

  • Balanced Revenue Mobilisation: Increase Own Tax and Non-Tax Revenues without burdening the public, ensuring alignment with state priorities.
  • Private Investment in Less Developed States: Focus on attracting private investment to less developed states like Chhattisgarh.
  • Adoption of 12th Finance Commission Recommendations: Implement multi-dimensional restructuring of government finances, including tax reforms, rationalising subsidies, and strengthening local bodies.
  • Rationalising Revenue Deficits: Avoid using capital receipts for revenue expenditure and focus on increasing investment.
  • Harnessing Royalty Rates on Minerals: Regularly revise and levy ad valorem royalty rates on minerals to boost state revenue.

 

Conclusion:

State governments must adopt multi-faceted approaches, including better revenue mobilisation, prudent fiscal management, and efficient resource utilisation, to improve their financial positions and better serve citizens.

Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post India’s SECI Seeks Long-Term Green Ammonia Supply
Next Post Reassessment of FTA Negotiation under BIMSTEC