Font size:
Print
Holtec International’s Proposal for Small Reactors in India
Context:
Holtec International, a New Jersey-based private company, has proposed deploying its Small Modular Reactors (SMR-300) in India, which may revive the commercial potential of the 2008 US-India civil nuclear deal.
Holtec’s SMR Proposal:
- The SMR-300 is a pressurised light-water reactor with a capacity of 300 MWe per unit.
- Holtec suggests using existing coal plant sites in India to deploy SMRs.
- Potential for joint manufacturing in India is being explored.
SMRs and Clean Energy:
- SMRs, with capacities of 30MWe to 300 MWe, are seen as a viable option to meet increasing power demands, especially with the rise in AI applications and data centres.
- Benefits include lower capital investment, efficiency, siting flexibility, and a clean energy transition.
Significance of the Deal:
- Energy Security: SMRs offer a reliable, low-carbon alternative to coal, reducing dependence on fossil fuels and shielding India from oil and gas price shocks.
- Technological Growth: SMRs, with their modular design, boost India’s nuclear program, encourage foreign investment, and advance self-reliance in cutting-edge technologies.
- Environmental Impact: SMRs support India’s climate goals and improve air quality by reducing coal dependency.
- Defence Implications: SMRs indirectly bolster national security through advancements in nuclear technology.
- Geopolitical Benefits: SMRs enhance energy independence, strengthen India’s role in global nuclear governance, and counterbalance China’s influence in nuclear technology.
Background on India-US Nuclear Deal:
- Signed in 2008, allows US companies to supply nuclear technology to India.
- Inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were permitted as part of the deal.
- Benefits include access to dual-use nuclear technology for India’s energy security.
Strategic Considerations:
-
Global Context:
-
-
- Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are gaining momentum worldwide, with operational projects in Russia and China.
- India is eager to integrate into the global SMR supply chain, though its existing reactors, Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) using heavy water and natural uranium, are not aligned with the dominant global trend of light-water reactors.
- Meanwhile, China is positioning itself to lead in the SMR space, particularly targeting the Global South.
-
-
Strengthening India US Collaboration :
-
-
- Both India and the US face challenges in competing with China in the Small Modular Reactor (SMR) sector.
- India has technological limitations, while the US grapples with high labour costs and increasing protectionist policies.
- A partnership between the two nations could provide a strategic advantage, allowing them to pool resources and expertise to advance SMR technology, which would be mutually beneficial in strengthening their position in the global market.
-
Challenges:
- India’s Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act (2010): This act assigns liability to operators and suppliers, which has deterred foreign players from investing.
- US 10 CFR 810 Authorisation: This restricts the export of nuclear equipment and design work from the US, which complicates India’s manufacturing ambitions.
- Russian Interest : Russia is showing interest in expanding its nuclear cooperation with India, potentially including partnerships on SMR projects which can hamper India- US collaboration.
- Grid Integration: Grid integration of SMRs in India poses a challenge due to the country’s strained power infrastructure, characterised by growing demand and frequent outages.
Challenges for India’s SMR Development:
- Technological Disparities: India’s PHWR technology lags behind global trends in light-water reactors (LWRs).
- High External Costs: SMR projects involve substantial costs, affecting economic feasibility.
- Regulatory Hurdles: India’s current nuclear regulations are outdated for SMR deployment.
- Public Safety Perception: Fears of nuclear accidents hinder public support.