Navigating Economic Indicators and Policy Implications

  • 0
  • 3168
Font size:
Print

Navigating Economic Indicators and Policy Implications

Context:

The economy shows a paradox of weak consumption growth, sluggish employment, and low core inflation despite strong overall growth, highlighting the need for a deeper analysis of these trends.

 

Economic Indicators and Their Implications:

  • Consumption: Consumption growth is weak, growing at just 4%, half the rate of the overall GDP growth.
    • Household savings are declining and borrowing is rising, indicating that households are not saving more but borrowing to sustain consumption.
      • Household net financial savings was only 5.7% of GDP in 2023-24, below the 7.6% of GDP average in the years before Covid. 
    • Weak consumption is a signal of weak growth rather than high growth with low consumption.
  • Employment: Employment growth is weak despite strong GDP figures.
    • The official employment statistics might present an overly optimistic view, as the actual employment conditions could be more problematic than reported.
  • Weak employment growth reflects broader economic weakness, not strong growth.
  • Core Inflation: Core inflation (excluding food and fuel prices) has fallen at a low level of 3%, despite strong GDP growth.
    • Low core inflation suggests that aggregate demand is weak, indicating that growth may not be as strong as reported.
    • Low core inflation supports the view that growth is modest rather than robust.

 

 

Navigating Economic Indicators and Policy Implications

 

Headline and Core inflation:

  • Headline inflation: It Denotes the overall change in the value of all goods within the basket of goods.
  • Core inflation: It is calculated by excluding food and fuel items from the headline inflation figure.
  • Since the prices of fuel and food items tend to fluctuate and create ‘noise’ in inflation computation, core inflation is less volatile than headline inflation.

 

Policy Recommendations:

  • Avoid Tax Cuts: Tax cuts would impact only a small portion of the population i.e top 10-20% tax paying population, and could exacerbate inequality.
  • Moreover, such measures would be inequitable given the K-shaped recovery and the adverse impact on the informal sector.
  • Focus is needed on structural reforms instead of cyclical adjustments.
  • Prioritise Privatisation: Implementing a privatisation strategy could spur investment and modernization in state-owned enterprises.
    • It is unwise for the government to invest more public funds into inefficient public sector undertakings like Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL).
  • Adjust Monetary Policy: With weak growth and low core inflation, reducing interest rates could stimulate demand.
  • Lower rates might lead to a weaker rupee, enhancing export competitiveness.

 

Navigating Economic Indicators and Policy Implications

 

K-shaped recovery:

A K-shaped recovery describes a scenario where, after a recession, various sectors of the economy rebound at disparate rates, times, or levels.

 

Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Life Expectancy Decline in India Due to Covid-19
Next Post Partition of Bengal (1905)
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x