Rebuilding the Teesta-3 Dam

  • 0
  • 3039
Font size:
Print

Rebuilding the Teesta-3 Dam

Context:

On January 27, 2025, an expert committee of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change recommended rebuilding the Teesta-3 dam on the Teesta River in Sikkim.

 

More on News

  • A powerful glacial lake outburst flood (October 2023) from South Lhonak Lake destroyed the dam and hydroelectric facility.
  • Over 100 people were killed, and more than 80,000 people across four districts were affected.

 

Details of the GLOF

  • The moraine failure sent rocks into the lake, triggering a strong ripple and sending 50 billion litres of water into the valley
  • The flood carried dam debris downstream, worsening destruction.
  • This also caused multiple landslides 30-40 kilometers downstream

 

Impact of Global Warming

  • Accelerated Glacier Melting: Global warming and black carbon (soot) are melting Himalayan glaciers rapidly. As glaciers shrink, melting speeds up, increasing water accumulation in glacial lakes.
  • Expanding Glacial Lakes: A 2024 Central Water Commission report found a 10.8% rise in the number of Himalayan glacial lakes since 2011. Their total surface area increased by 33.7% in the same period.
    • The South Lhonak Lake, formed in the early 1960s, had grown to 167 hectares by 2023
  • Geological Instability: Glacial retreat destabilises geological formations, further increasing risk in the region.

 

Concerns Over Rebuilding Teesta-3

  • Questionable Justification: The committee cited Teesta-3’s “success” and “commercial viability” pre-GLOF. The dam’s power-generating equipment remained largely intact. Critics argue this reasoning ignores climate risks and ecological concerns.
  • Ongoing Legal and Regulatory Issues: Public interest litigations have called for Teesta-3’s scrapping due to:
    • It is located in an earthquake- and landslide-prone area.
    • Techno-economic clearance issues.
    • Non-compliance with a 1996 notification requiring Sikkim to hold 51% equity.
    • Alleged corruption.

 

Teesta-3 Dam 2.0 Design

  • The committee proposed rebuilding the dam with a more robust design:
    • A new dam will be built entirely with concrete, replacing the previous concrete-rock mix.
    • Spillway volume to be nearly three times larger.
    • An early-warning system for flooding is to be implemented.
  • Climate-Based Design Considerations: India Meteorological Department modelled a “worst-case scenario” based on projected maximum rainfall for the next century. Critics argue rainfall alone is an inadequate predictor of GLOF risks.

 

Expert Concerns on Risk Multiplication

  • Complex Risk Factors: The 2023 GLOF may not have been caused by heavy rain; local weather stations recorded only moderate rainfall. Other risk factors include:
    • Erosion and sediment transport.
    • Riverbank collapses and landslides.
    • Impact of sediment movement on water levels.
  • International Expert Assessment (January 30, 2025): A study by IIT Bhubaneswar, IISc Bengaluru, Indo-Tibetan Border Police, and the Sikkim government stated that existing GLOF models fail to account for key erosion and sediment transport processes.
    • Water waves move faster than sediment waves, increasing the risk of unexpected flooding dynamics.

 

Commercial Viability vs. Public Safety

  • Power Demand Consideration: India’s rising electricity demand makes hydropower attractive. However, hydropower must be balanced against disaster risks.
  • Potential Risks of Teesta-3 2.0: If the dam fails in another GLOF, the destruction downstream could be even worse. A new facility with additional features also introduces new failure modes.

 

Broader Socio-Economic and Environmental Implications

  • Need for Social Security Measures: Local residents need economic and health security to withstand disasters. Disaster response should prioritise rebuilding lives, not just infrastructure.
  • Long-Term Sustainability Questions: Urban planning expert Brian Stone, Jr. argues “We cannot engineer our way out of climate change; retreat is inevitable.”
    • Over time, either disaster-prone areas will shrink, or the cost of maintaining infrastructure in such areas will rise.

 

Way Forward

  • Risk Assessment Framework Needed: Decisions should prioritise minimising local risk over commercial viability. A structured risk determination matrix should define acceptable risk levels.
  • Transparent Cost-Benefit Analysis: The true cost of disaster preparedness must be included in power tariffs. Externalising these costs for short-term financial viability is unsustainable.
  • Reconsideration Urged: Given climate risks, public opposition, and scientific uncertainty, the rebuilding of Teesta-3 demands a more thorough assessment before moving forward.

 

About Teesta River

  • Also Known As: Torsa River (in Bangladesh)
  • Origin: Pauhunri Glacier, Eastern Himalayas, Sikkim, India
  • Course: Flows through Sikkim & West Bengal → Enters Bangladesh → Merges with Brahmaputra near Gaibandha
    • Transboundary river between India & Bangladesh
  • Length: ~414 km
  • Main Tributaries:
  • Right-bank: Zemu Chhu, Rangyong Chhu, Rangit River
  • Left-bank: Lachung Chhu, Chakung Chhu, Dik Chhu, Rani Khola, Rangpo Chhu

 

Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Sovereign Green Bonds in India: Issues and Challenges
Next Post Preserving India's Cultural Heritage: Challenges and Conservation Efforts
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x