Font size:
Print
Rethinking-Development-Models
Context:
The recent catastrophic wildfires in California, with damages estimated at $250 billion—roughly equivalent to Greece’s GDP in 2023—serve as a stark reminder of the costs of development models pursued by the wealthiest nations.
More on News
- These fires highlight the destructive consequences of the lifestyle that places heavy demand on the planet’s resources.
- The question is: Can we continue to pursue this model of progress, or is it time for a fundamental rethinking of what development truly means?
The Unsustainable Consumption of Developed Nations
- If all nations consumed resources like the United States or the European Union, multiple earths would be required to sustain such lifestyles.
- Despite this, benchmarks like the UN’s Human Development Index (HDI) portray these countries as ideal development models.
- This disconnect between celebrated metrics and ecological realities is dangerous.
Limitations of the Human Development Index (HDI)
- The HDI measures life expectancy, education, and income but ignores environmental pressures.
- Top-ranking HDI countries (e.g., Ireland, Norway, Switzerland) are also among the highest resource consumers and carbon polluters.
- If these models were globally adopted, it would lead to ecological collapse.
- High-income nations have overshot multiple planetary boundaries, including greenhouse gas emissions and ecological destruction.
The Introduction and Limitations of the Planetary Pressures-adjusted HDI (PHDI)
- The UN introduced the PHDI in 2020, adjusting HDI scores based on environmental impact.
- However, PHDI still ranks countries relatively rather than against absolute ecological limits.
- Nordic countries, consuming over five earths’ worth of resources per capita, continue to score highly due to relative comparisons.
- This approach creates an illusion of progress while maintaining unsustainable consumption patterns.
Learning from Middle-Income Countries
- Research identifies countries achieving decent living standards with lower ecological footprints:
- Costa Rica has achieved high life expectancy, universal health care, and near-universal literacy while maintaining a low resource footprint, thanks to investments in renewable energy and forest conservation.
- Sri Lanka, with an HDI of 0.78, has achieved impressive social outcomes like universal health care and literacy. However, the country faces deep vulnerabilities, including a recent economic crisis and ethnic tensions, showing that true sustainability requires social and ecological justice.
India’s Path Forward
- India, with 1.4 billion people, cannot afford to mimic the consumption patterns of affluent countries. Instead, it must look to alternative development models, like those of Costa Rica and Sri Lanka, that balance human development with environmental stewardship.
- The development model should prioritise social justice and ecological boundaries, recognising that true progress means dignity for all citizens within the Earth’s limits.
Rethinking Progress for the 21st Century
- Metrics like the HDI and PHDI treat growth as an unquestioned good. However, growth must be reconceptualised in terms of both social and environmental sustainability.
- True progress, especially for developing nations like India, should not be measured by GDP growth or HDI rankings. Instead, progress should create societies where all citizens live with dignity, equality, and safety within ecological boundaries.
This shift in how we define and pursue progress is not just a moral imperative—it is essential for survival in the face of climate change and environmental degradation. By adopting a more holistic, sustainable development model, we can create a future that works for people and the planet.
