Rising Global Nuclear Arsenals

  • 0
  • 3087
Font size:
Print

Rising Global Nuclear Arsenals

Context:

SIPRI’s Yearbook 2024 reports increased nuclear weapons development and a greater reliance on nuclear deterrence by states, according to its latest assessment on armaments, disarmament, and international security.

 

Strengthening of Nuclear Arsenals Worldwide:

  • Nuclear Modernisation and Expansion:
    • In 2023, the nine nuclear-armed statesUnited States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel—continued to modernise their arsenals. 
    • By January 2024, the global inventory of nuclear warheads reached 12,121, with 9,585 in military stockpiles
    • Approximately 3,904 warheads were deployed with missiles and aircraft, marking an increase of 60 from the previous year
    • Russia and the USA kept nearly 2,100 of these deployed warheads on high operational alert.
  • Increasing Arsenals:
    • The United States and Russia possess almost 90% of all nuclear weapons
    • Russia deployed 36 more warheads with operational forces in 2023
    • China’s arsenal saw the most significant growth, from 410 to 500 warheads
    • India, Pakistan, and North Korea are developing capabilities for multiple warhead deployment on ballistic missiles.

Rising Global Nuclear Arsenals

  • Reduced Transparency:
    • Post-2022, transparency on nuclear forces declined, particularly between the USA and Russia. 
    • Russia allegedly deployed nuclear weapons in Belarus without conclusive evidence. 
    • Nuclear diplomacy faced setbacks, with Russia suspending the New START treaty and withdrawing from the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT).

New START Treaty:

  • The New START Treaty between the US and Russia limits each to 1,550 deployed strategic warheads and 800 launchers
  • It includes verification measures like on-site inspections and telemetry exchanges
  • The Treaty, effective from February 2011, allows flexibility in strategic force structure and exempts missile defence and conventional strike capabilities from constraints.

India’s Nuclear Developments:

  • India expanded its arsenal from 164 to 172 warheads in 2023
  • It developed longer-range missiles like the Agni-V, which can carry multiple nuclear warheads. 
  • India’s nuclear weapons are stored de-mated, except for submarine-launched ballistic missiles which must be ready at all times.

 

No First Use (NFU) Policy:

  • India maintains a No First Use (NFU) policy, committing to use nuclear weapons only in retaliation. 
  • However, experts suggest India might be ready for preemptive strikes, especially against Pakistan, given its developed capabilities. 
  • Despite tensions with China, India upholds the NFU policy, although strategic deception or lack of robust capabilities may underlie this stance.

Demateted Nuclear Weapon:

  • A demated nuclear weapon has its fissile material separated from other components, ensuring it cannot be detonated accidentally or unauthorisedly, enhancing safety during peacetime.
  • India’s nuclear weapons are generally kept in this state, aligning with its no-first-use doctrine.
  • However, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, like those on the INS Arihant, must be ready for immediate use, indicating some submarine-based nuclear weapons are kept in a mated configuration.

Historical Context of India’s Nuclear Program

  • Early Developments
    • India’s nuclear journey began post-independence, spearheaded by Dr. Homi Bhabha
    • The 1974 nuclear test was a response to perceived injustices in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). 
    • International sanctions followed but did not deter India’s progress.
  • Doctrine and Policy
    • Post-1998 tests, India formalised its nuclear doctrine, emphasising credible minimum deterrence and NFU
    • The doctrine outlines massive retaliation and political control over nuclear use, stressing non-use against non-nuclear states.

 

Challenges and Strategic Considerations:

  • Doctrine Debates
    • India’s adherence to NFU faces scrutiny. Some argue it allows adversaries to take the initiative, particularly with Pakistan’s low nuclear thresholds. 
    • Abandoning NFU could destabilise regional balance and strain India’s nuclear capabilities.
  • Strategic Costs
    • Adopting a first-use policy would require substantial investments in nuclear arsenals and delivery systems. 
    • India’s existing arsenal is modest, and a preemptive strike on Pakistan would deplete resources, leaving it vulnerable to China.

 

Diplomatic and Security Strategies

  • Global Nuclear Order
    • India’s nuclear policy promotes stability and supports its aspirations for membership in groups like the Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG)
    • Advocating for a global NFU order, India emphasises joint efforts with China to enhance nuclear security.
  • Regional Stability
    • India should focus on “dissuasive deterrence” by enhancing border infrastructure and surveillance. 
    • Maintaining NFU while bolstering conventional capabilities can project strength and ensure security without escalating nuclear risks.

 

Conclusion:

  • India’s nuclear doctrine reflects a commitment to responsible stewardship and strategic autonomy. 
  • By maintaining a modest arsenal and an NFU policy, India aims to deter aggression while minimising nuclear risks. 
  • The doctrine’s focus on credible minimum deterrence and massive retaliation underscores a cautious approach to nuclear weapons, ensuring stability in a complex international environment. 
  • Advocating for global disarmament and strategic stability, India seeks to balance national security with broader disarmament goals.
Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Amended Surrogacy Leave Rules for Government Employees.
Next Post 4th Tranche Auction for Critical and Strategic Minerals
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x