Font size:
Print
Surveillance Capitalism
Context:
In the digital age, the concept of surveillance capitalism has emerged as a powerful force, reshaping the way personal data is collected, analysed, and monetised.
What is Surveillance Capitalism?
- Coined by Shoshana Zuboff in The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (2018), this term describes a new economic system where personal data is harvested, analysed, and sold by tech corporations to predict and influence human behaviour.
- Unlike traditional capitalism, which revolves around the production and sale of goods and services, surveillance capitalism extracts human experience itself as raw material.
- Our online activity—search history, social media interactions, location data, even private conversations—becomes commodified and sold to advertisers, political campaigns, and other entities.
How Does It Work?
- Tech giants like Google, Meta (Facebook, Instagram), and Amazon have transformed the internet into a vast surveillance machine, tracking every click, purchase, and even offline movements through smartphone data.
- Zuboff introduces the term instrumentarian power, which refers to the subtle, non-coercive control that these companies exercise over us. They predict, manipulate, and nudge our behaviour through targeted ads, recommendation algorithms, and personalised content.
- Example: Netflix’s recommendation system suggests content based on your viewing patterns, subtly shaping your entertainment choices.
- Example: Facebook and Google curate news feeds that reinforce existing beliefs, making users more predictable in their behaviour.
- This predictability is valuable—advertisers and political strategists use it to influence purchasing decisions, political opinions, and even social interactions.
How is This Different from Industrial Capitalism?
-
- In industrial capitalism, companies profit by selling goods and services. They focus on labour, efficiency, and material production.
- In contrast, surveillance capitalism profits by extracting and manipulating behavioural data. Instead of producing tangible products, companies commodify human experience—users are both consumers and raw material for predictive analytics.
- Key difference:
-
- Industrial capitalism = Controlling labour
- Surveillance capitalism = Controlling behaviour
The Role of Governments in Mass Surveillance
- A major concern is the growing collaboration between tech companies and governments. Instead of developing their own surveillance systems, governments increasingly rely on privately collected data for: Policing and law enforcement, Intelligence gathering, and Social control.
- This blurs the line between private corporate interests and state power, reducing democratic accountability and privacy rights.
- Example: The Cambridge Analytica scandal (2014) exposed how Facebook user data was exploited without consent to influence elections in the U.S. and other countries.
The Impact on Autonomy
- Surveillance capitalism is not just about data collection; it gradually erodes personal autonomy.
- Every action online is recorded, analysed, and used to refine behavioural predictions.
- Algorithms slowly condition individuals to consume content that serves corporate interests.
- Users become passive subjects, nudged into specific choices without realising it.
- This process can manipulate public opinion, reinforce biases, and weaken critical thinking, as people are increasingly fed what they want to see rather than objective or diverse perspectives.
Regulatory Challenges
- Despite rising awareness, regulations struggle to keep up with the fast-evolving tech landscape.
- The EU’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) and India’s DPDPA (Digital Personal Data Protection Act) aim to give users more control over their data. However, they fail to address the core problem—the commodification of human experience itself.
- Corporate lobbying and political influence further weaken regulatory efforts. Tech companies have deep ties with policymakers, making it difficult to implement meaningful restrictions on data collection and manipulation.
Why It Matters?
- As our lives become increasingly intertwined with digital platforms, surveillance capitalism is no longer just an abstract academic concern—it affects everyone.
- What can we do?
-
- Be aware of how your data is being used
- Use privacy-focused alternatives (e.g., Signal instead of WhatsApp, DuckDuckGo instead of Google)
- Advocate for stronger data protection laws
- Limit social media usage and review privacy settings
Recognising the impact of surveillance capitalism empowers individuals to demand better protections for their privacy and autonomy. If left unchecked, this system could redefine capitalism itself—prioritising data extraction over human freedom.