Font size:
Print
Tensions in the Arctic: Geopolitical and Strategic Implications
Context:
The Arctic region, once isolated and inaccessible, is witnessing increasing geopolitical tensions due to climate change and resource exploration. The absence of a comprehensive legal framework like the Antarctic Treaty has led to overlapping territorial claims and military posturing by global powers.
Geopolitical Stakeholders and Governance of Arctic
The Role of the Arctic Council
- The Arctic Council is the main intergovernmental body responsible for cooperation and dispute resolution.
- Key members include the US, Russia, Canada, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Iceland.
- 13 observer nations, including China, India, and Germany, participate but do not have direct decision-making power.
- The Council focuses on sustainability, environmental protection, and diplomatic conflict resolution.
- However, non-binding resolutions and lack of enforcement powers limit its effectiveness in managing geopolitical tensions.
- The Arctic Council comprises eight member states: Canada, Denmark (via Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, and the U.S.
- The council primarily focuses on environmental protection, scientific research, and indigenous rights but does not address security or military issues.
- Governance is primarily regulated by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), allowing nations to claim extended continental shelves.
- Canada, Denmark, and Russia have overlapping claims to the Arctic seabed, further intensifying disputes.
Key Areas of Conflict
- The Northwest Passage Dispute
-
- The Northwest Passage (NWP) is a potential shipping route through Canada’s Arctic Archipelago.
- Canada claims it as its internal waters, granting it sovereign control.
- The U.S. and other nations consider it an international strait, arguing for free navigation rights.
- This disagreement creates diplomatic friction, particularly between Ottawa and Washington.
- Russian Military and Economic Presence
-
- Russia is the dominant Arctic power, possessing the largest icebreaker fleet, including nuclear-powered vessels.
- Moscow has established military bases, airfields, and radar installations along its Arctic coast.
- In 2007, Russia planted a flag on the seabed at the North Pole, symbolically reinforcing its territorial claims.
- Following the Ukraine conflict, Russia’s relations with Arctic Council members, especially NATO states, have deteriorated.
- U.S. and Denmark’s Tensions Over Greenland
-
- Former U.S. President Donald Trump expressed interest in buying Greenland, citing its strategic significance.
- Greenland hosts the U.S. Pituffik military base, crucial for Arctic security.
- Denmark, which governs Greenland, has increased its military presence in response.
- The issue has strained U.S.-Denmark relations and renewed debates about Greenlandic sovereignty.
- NATO’s Growing Arctic Engagement
-
- With Finland and Sweden joining NATO, the alliance has increased Arctic military exercises.
- The Greenland-Iceland-UK (GIUK) gap is a strategic chokepoint for NATO naval operations.
- Russia views NATO’s Arctic expansion as a direct threat to its security.
Economic and Strategic Significance of the Arctic
- Resource Wealth
- The 2009 U.S. Geological Survey estimated that the Arctic contains:
- 13% of the world’s undiscovered oil
- 30% of its untapped natural gas
-
- Greenland has large rare earth element deposits, attracting global investment interest.
- Russia, Canada, and Norway are actively expanding their oil and gas exploration efforts.
- Emerging Trade Routes
-
- The Northeast Passage along Russia’s coast could reduce the distance between East Asia and Europe by 8,000 km compared to the Suez Canal route.
- China is keen on developing a Polar Silk Road but requires Russian cooperation.
- The Arctic’s ice-free summers could make these routes commercially viable in the future.
- China’s Increasing Arctic Engagement
- China declared itself a ‘Near-Arctic State’ in 2018.
- It is constructing its first nuclear-powered icebreaker to support Arctic operations.
- China-Russia ties have strengthened, including joint naval exercises in the East China Sea, signalling potential future cooperation in Arctic security.
Challenges and Future Outlook
- Legal and Environmental Concerns
-
- The lack of an Arctic Treaty like the Antarctic framework creates regulatory ambiguities.
- Climate change is driving rapid environmental degradation, with implications for global weather patterns.
- Military Escalation Risks
-
- Increased militarisation and territorial claims could lead to potential flashpoints.
- NATO and Russia’s confrontational posture may escalate regional tensions further.
- Indigenous and Humanitarian Issues
-
- Indigenous Arctic communities face threats from climate change and resource exploitation.
- Their traditional livelihoods and cultural heritage are at risk due to geopolitical manoeuvring.
India’s Interests in the Arctic
- India’s strategic interests include scientific research, climate studies, and resource exploration.
- India’s Arctic Policy (2022) prioritises climate sustainability, international cooperation, and economic engagement.
- Indian companies, especially in energy, are exploring Arctic resource partnerships.
- Himadri research station in Svalbard highlights India’s commitment to Arctic sustainability.
The Future of the Arctic and Global Stability
- The Arctic is at a geopolitical crossroads, with climate change and power politics shaping its future.
- The region’s economic potential and strategic location make it a flashpoint for great power rivalry.
- The role of the Arctic Council and other international bodies will determine whether tensions escalate into conflict or lead to diplomatic resolutions.
- The 2020s could be a defining decade, shaping international cooperation or geopolitical strife.
- As global attention shifts toward US-China and US-Russia tensions, the Arctic deserves greater scrutiny due to its rising geopolitical significance.
