Font size:
Print
The Indian Railways and Meghalaya: Challenges in Expanding Rail Connectivity
Context:
Meghalaya is set to become the only Indian state capital without railway connectivity as Indian Railways is likely to shelve key projects due to local opposition.
More in News
- Khasi and Jaintia pressure groups strongly resist railway expansion, fearing an unchecked influx of outsiders.
- This resistance is closely linked to the demand for the Inner Line Permit (ILP), a mechanism to regulate migration.
- The government supports railway expansion citing economic benefits, but local stakeholders remain divided.
Existing Rail Connectivity in Meghalaya
- Mendipathar Railway Station in North Garo Hills is the only operational railway station in Meghalaya since 2014.
- Passenger trains connect Mendipathar to Guwahati, and the station recently started handling freight transport.
- The Northeast Frontier Railways (NFR) has three sanctioned projects, all facing opposition.
Railway Projects in Meghalaya and Their Current Status
- Tetelia-Byrnihat Line (2010): 21.5 km project; 19 km in Assam completed, but opposition in Meghalaya stalled progress. Railways may terminate at Assam border.
- Byrnihat-Shillong Line (2011): 108.76 km with 10 stations; halted due to Khasi Students’ Union (KSU) opposition. Meghalaya asked to return unutilised funds.
- Chandranathpur-Jowai Line (2023): Survey stage, linking Chandranathpur (Assam) to Jowai (Meghalaya), but facing Jaintia pressure group opposition.
Reasons for Opposition
- Fear of Large-Scale Migration and Demographic Changes: Khasi and Jaintia groups fear that railway connectivity will lead to an uncontrolled influx of outsiders.
-
- Meghalaya’s indigenous communities (Garos ~10 lakhs, Khasis ~13-14 lakhs) worry about becoming a minority.
- Demand for Inner Line Permit (ILP): ILP is already in place in Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram, and Manipur.
-
- Khasi Students’ Union (KSU) demands its implementation before railway projects proceed.
- ILP would allow for checkpoints at railway stations to regulate movement.
- Concerns Over Land and Cultural Identity: Locals fear that railway expansion could lead to land alienation and weaken cultural preservation efforts.
-
- There is concern over unchecked urbanisation and land grabbing by external entities.
Counterarguments Supporting Railway Expansion
- Economic Benefits: Reduced transportation costs will bring down inflation and improve business viability.
-
- Meghalaya relies on small-scale agriculture and service sectors; better logistics can enhance trade and mobility.
- Boost to Local Entrepreneurs and Commerce: Improved connectivity will allow Meghalaya’s businesses to access larger markets.
-
- Easier movement of goods in and out of the state can help in economic upliftment.
- Current Dependence on Road Transport: Road transport is expensive and unreliable, contributing to high prices of essential goods.
-
- Railways provide a cheaper, faster, and more efficient alternative.
Political and Social Divisions on Railway Expansion
- Government Standpoint: Meghalaya Chief Minister Conrad Sangma has supported railway connectivity for economic reasons.
-
- He argues it will reduce logistical costs, increase efficiency, and benefit businesses and consumers.
- Public Sentiment and Pressure Groups: While pressure groups like KSU and Jaintia National Council oppose the projects, the general public remains indifferent.
- Some Garo representatives support railway expansion in the Garo Hills region and are demanding new railway lines.
