The Middle-Income Trap

By The Study IAS

Oct 14, 2024

0
3080

Font size:

The Middle-Income Trap

Context:

The World Development Report 2024, authored by the World Bank, highlights a critical challenge facing many economies i.e. the “middle-income trap.”

Middle-Income Trap Overview:

The middle-income trap occurs when a country experiences a slowdown in growth after reaching middle-income status, often due to structural inefficiencies and an inability to innovate.
This phenomenon refers to the stagnation of growth rates as countries transition from middle-income to high-income status, particularly when their per capita income reaches about 11% of the U.S.
The World Bank’s analysis reveals that over the past 34 years, only 34 middle-income economies (with per capita incomes between $1,136 and $13,845) have moved to higher income levels.
Economic indicators such as GDP per capita, productivity rates, and investment levels are crucial in assessing whether a nation is trapped or on the path to advancement.

Case Studies

Historically, many nations that escaped the middle-income trap, particularly within the European Union, benefited from institutions that facilitated the free movement of capital and labour.
In contrast, most non-European countries face capital inflows with significant restrictions on labour mobility.
South Korea: Adopted a heavily interventionist state model. The South Korean government directed the private sector’s activities and promoted an export-driven growth model, rewarding successful companies with access to new technologies while allowing underperformers to fail.
Chile: Managed to break the middle-income trap through targeted state interventions, particularly in its natural resource exporting sectors, such as the successful salmon industry.

Current Challenges for India:

Structural Issues: India faces unique challenges in escaping the middle-income trap, including:
- Increased influence of billionaires who are perceived to be close to the state.
- A stagnating manufacturing sector and a reversal in structural transformation, with more employment returning to low-productive agricultural jobs post-pandemic.
Economic Disparity: Despite reported real GDP growth of around 7%, real wages have not kept pace with inflation, leading to stagnant purchasing power for workers.
The Democratic Dilemma: The successful export strategies of South Korea and Chile were implemented under authoritarian regimes that suppressed labour unions and dissent.

This raises a crucial point: while state intervention is necessary for growth, it must not come at the cost of democratic principles.

Recommendations:

Governments in middle-income countries must develop competition policies that support a balance among large corporations and startups.
Focus on the value companies bring to the economy rather than their size.
Encourage upward mobility for citizens rather than adopting zero-sum policies aimed at reducing income inequality.

Conclusion:

The insights from the World Development Report 2024 underscore the complexity of breaking the middle-income trap. India, with its unique challenges and opportunities, must adopt lessons from successful economies while navigating its path in a democratic framework.

Is this helpful ? x

Subscribe to our Youtube Channel for more Valuable Content – TheStudyias

Download the App to Subscribe to our Courses – Thestudyias