Trump 2.0 and the Evolving U.S.-India Defence Partnership

  • 0
  • 3060
Font size:
Print

Trump 2.0 and the Evolving U.S.-India Defence Partnership

Context:

The recent official working visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the United States (February 13, 2025) has reinforced bilateral defence cooperation. The visit facilitated progress on several defence-related agreements, strengthening India’s defence industrial base and strategic partnership with the U.S.

 

Major Defence Agreements and Acquisitions

  • Defence Co-production and Supply Chain Integration
    • India is likely to proceed with the purchase and co-production of:
  • ‘Javelin’ Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs)
  • ‘Stryker’ Infantry Combat Vehicles (ICVs)
    • This will enhance domestic manufacturing and integrate India into the global defence supply chain.
  • Strengthening Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA)
    • India will acquire six additional P-8I maritime patrol aircraft for the Indian Navy.
    • This will improve India’s surveillance capabilities in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).
  • The New 10-Year Framework for Major Defence Partnership
    • A new framework agreement for defence collaboration will guide cooperation into the next decade.
    • It will focus on technology transfers, joint development projects, and increased defence trade.
  • Advancements in Unmanned Aerial and Autonomous Systems
    • The Autonomous Systems Industry Alliance (ASIA) has been announced to boost collaboration in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS).
    • Key agreements include:
      • Anduril Industries-Mahindra Group partnership.
      • L3Harris-Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) joint development of Active Towed Array Systems (ATAS).
  • Expansion in Space, Air Defence, and Undersea Warfare Cooperation
    • Review of cooperation in undersea systems, fifth-generation fighter aircraft, and space security.
    • Potential acceleration in air defence technologies and anti-tank missile systems.
  • Regulatory Reforms and Trade Synergy
    • The U.S. and India will review existing regulatory regimes for arms transfers.
    • Initiation of negotiations for a Reciprocal Defence Procurement (RDP) agreement to streamline acquisition mechanisms and defence trade.

 

Challenges and Concerns

  • Delays in General Electric (GE) Aerospace Engine Supply
    • The joint statement did not mention the urgent delivery of GE Aerospace’s F-404 GE-IN-20 engines for the Tejas Mark 1A.
    • Absence of clarity on the 80% Transfer of Technology (ToT) for GE F-414 engines, crucial for the Tejas Mark-II variant.
  • Potential Integration of the F-35 Fighter Jet
  • Challenges in integrating the F-35 into the Indian Air Force (IAF): Existing capability gaps and logistical constraints.
  • Need for continued induction of Tejas Mark 1A and Mark-II jets as replacements for retired MiG-21 squadrons.
  • Concerns over infrastructure costs, maintenance requirements, and intrusive U.S. inspection regimes.
  • Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) Project
  • The MMRCA program for 114 multi-role fighter aircraft has remained unresolved since 2000.
  • Past selection of Dassault Rafale (2011-12) failed due to disputes over Transfer of Technology (ToT) and cost negotiations.
  • Any future deal with the U.S. on F-35s may come without ToT and could impose restrictions on operational use.

 

Strategic Implications of the Defence Partnership

  • Enhancing India’s Indigenous Defence Capabilities: Co-production initiatives will bolster India’s Make in India initiative and self-reliance in defence.
  • Geopolitical Significance: Strengthened U.S.-India defence ties counterbalance China’s growing military influence in the Indo-Pacific.
  • Alignment with Quad and Indo-Pacific Strategy: Greater interoperability in defence platforms supports India’s role in regional security frameworks.

 

Challenges in India-U.S. Defence Cooperation

  • Lack of technology transfer: U.S. hesitancy to share cutting-edge defence technologies.
  • Regulatory hurdles: U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) restrict seamless cooperation.
  • High costs of U.S. weapons: Procurement remains expensive compared to indigenous alternatives.
  • Limited progress in co-development: Despite agreements, joint ventures remain minimal.
  • Differing strategic priorities: The U.S. views India as a counterweight to China, while India seeks strategic autonomy.

Mismatch of Aspirations

  • India’s Defence Objectives:
    • Modernisation of armed forces with state-of-the-art weapon systems.
    • Co-development and co-production of future military technologies.
    • Promotion of Make in India and technological self-reliance (Aatmanirbharta).
  • US Approach:
    • Transactional and commerce-driven rather than strategic.
    • No competitive bidding; offers military equipment through bilateral interactions.
    • Focus on military sales rather than technology sharing.
    • Reluctance to transfer critical technologies, leading to stagnation in co-development.

Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post US, Ukraine agree to terms of critical minerals deal 
Next Post Supreme Court Stays Lokpal Order on Corruption Complaint Against HC Judge
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x