Font size:
Print
US, Ukraine agree to terms of critical minerals deal
Context:
The recently concluded US-Ukraine minerals deal marks a significant shift in geopolitics, economic diplomacy, and security considerations.
More in news
- Ukraine possesses vast reserves of critical minerals such as lithium, titanium, graphite, and rare earth elements, which are crucial for advanced technology and defence industries.
- However, the deal lacks explicit security guarantees, raising concerns over its long-term implications for Ukraine and European stability.
Key Features of the Agreement
- Establishment of a Reconstruction Investment Fund: Jointly managed by Kyiv and Washington, funded by mineral revenues.
- Revenue Sharing Model: Ukraine to contribute 50% of revenue from its natural resources until contributions reach $500 billion.
- US Financial Commitment: The US commits to supporting Ukraine’s economic stability without direct military assurances.
- Strategic Resource Utilisation: The deal ensures access to high-value minerals for the US, reducing dependency on China for critical raw materials
Global Geopolitical Context
- Historical Parallels with Oil Dependence
- In the 20th century, nations fought wars and engaged in foreign interventions due to their dependency on oil.
- The United States (US), once highly import-dependent, has become the world’s largest producer of oil and gas.
- Russia’s ability to sustain protracted wars, like in Ukraine, is largely due to its self-sufficiency in energy.
- China’s Dominance in Critical Minerals
- China controls over 75% of the world’s rare earth supply, giving it substantial leverage over global supply chains.
- It has increasingly restricted the export of key minerals, posing a challenge to dependent economies.
- US concerns mirror the Cold War scenario where control over oil was a key strategic factor.
- The US Response and Strategic Interests
- Ukraine’s vast reserves of lithium, graphite, and rare earths make it an important strategic asset.
- The US seeks to reduce reliance on China and secure alternative sources, including Ukraine, Canada, and Greenland.
- The race for critical minerals is shaping global alliances and influencing foreign policies.
Geopolitical and Strategic Implications
- For Ukraine
- Economic Reconstruction: Revenue from minerals could fund post-war rebuilding.
- US Stake in Ukraine’s Stability: While not providing military guarantees, the US has economic interests in Ukraine’s long-term stability.
- Strategic Leverage Against Russia: Strengthening Ukraine’s resource control limits Russia’s economic coercion.
- Concerns Over Sovereignty: Potential loss of control over strategic national resources.
- For the United States
- Securing Critical Mineral Supply Chains: Reduces reliance on China and Russia.
- Economic Gains: The deal ensures the return of US taxpayer money used in aid to Ukraine.
- Shift in Foreign Policy: Marks a departure from traditional US aid policies, emphasising economic reciprocity.
- Strategic Ambiguity on Security: By avoiding clear security guarantees, the US reduces its long-term commitment risk.
- For Europe
- Concerns Over Exclusion: European allies fear being sidelined in peace negotiations.
- Security Dependence on the US: The deal does not ensure continued military support for Ukraine.
- Potential Competition: Europe may face challenges accessing Ukraine’s mineral resources under US-dominated terms.
Russia’s Response and Countermoves
- Control Over Occupied Territories: Russia holds $350 billion worth of Ukrainian resources in annexed regions.
- Offering Rare Minerals to the US: Putin signalled willingness to provide rare minerals, countering Ukraine’s deal.
- Influencing Trump’s Policy: Russia seeks to delay negotiations and gain territorial advantages before formal talks begin.
Required Policy Interventions for India
- Liberalisation of Exploration and Mining
- Allowing private investment and global players to explore and extract critical minerals.
- Providing incentives for technology-driven exploration to identify new reserves.
- Strengthening Domestic Processing and Refining
- India lacks refining capabilities for critical minerals, increasing reliance on Chinese processing units.
India’s Dependence on Critical Minerals
- Import Dependence and Strategic Vulnerabilities
- India imports over 80% of its critical minerals, making it more dependent than for oil.
- The government has been signing supply agreements with friendly nations and investing in overseas assets.
- However, reliance on imports is risky due to geopolitical uncertainties and supply chain disruptions.
- Setting up domestic refining and value-addition industries is essential for supply chain security.
- Expanding Strategic Partnerships
- Diversifying import sources by securing long-term agreements with friendly nations.
- Investing in critical mineral mines overseas, similar to India’s approach to securing energy resources.
- Developing a Circular Economy
- Promoting recycling and recovery of critical minerals from electronic waste.
- Reducing dependency on fresh extraction by incentivising the reuse of key materials.
Conclusion
- The US-Ukraine minerals deal represents a significant geopolitical shift, prioritising economic interests over security guarantees.
- While Ukraine benefits from economic investment, long-term security concerns remain unresolved.
- The deal sets a new precedent for US foreign policy, reinforcing the ‘America First’ doctrine.
- The implications extend beyond Ukraine, affecting global security, economic dependencies, and international power dynamics.
