The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

Reassessment of FTA Negotiation under BIMSTEC

  • 0
  • 3076
Font size:
Print

Reassessment of FTA Negotiation under BIMSTEC

Context:

The Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal called for Re-evaluation of the BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement Approach Due to Slow Progress.

 

About BIMSTEC FTA negotiation:

  • The bloc has been negotiating a proposed Free Trade Agreement (FTA) since 2004, with 22 rounds of talks held so far including the last round that was held in 2018.
  • FTA Negotiations: BIMSTEC members have been focusing on trade in goods, services, investment, and customs cooperation. 
  • However, the agreement has faced delays, with key issues including differing tariff reduction schedules and unresolved trade barriers.

 

Trade Relations:

  • For India, the BIMSTEC economies continue to represent a negligible fraction of its total trade balance, worth only 7% of its total exports ($22 billion) and 2% of its imports ($9 billion).
  • India’s trade with BIMSTEC countries reached $44.32 billion in 2023-24. 
  • Thailand was the largest partner with a trade deficit of $4.87 billion, while Bangladesh had a trade surplus of $9.22 billion in India’s favour.
  • Intra-BIMSTEC trade remains significantly lower compared to other regional trade MERCOSUR (16%), and ASEAN (29%). 

 

Reasons for Economic Disintegration  of South Asia:

  • Institutional Challenges: Institutional mechanisms necessary for effective functioning of BIMSTEC are still inadequately established. 
  • The BIMSTEC permanent secretariat in Dhaka is often underfunded and understaffed, which hampers its ability to facilitate cooperation.
  • Lack of Political Will: According to C. Raja Mohan Lack of political will and competition between regional organisations like SAARC and ASEAN have hindered BIMSTEC’s prioritisation. 
  • Strained political relations and historical conflicts, such as between India and Pakistan, further impact regional cooperation and trust.
  • Economic Disparities:The member countries exhibit significant economic disparities, with some being least developed countries (LDCs). 
  • This leads to varied interests and priorities, complicating efforts for cohesive economic integration.
  • FDI in BIMSTEC is concentrated in India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, and Sri Lanka. 
  • Enhancing intra-regional investment cooperation and improving investment climates can boost economic development.
  • Lack of Infrastructure and Connectivity:Poor infrastructure and connectivity within the region hinder trade and investment. 
  • High transportation and logistics costs further exacerbate the challenges of enhancing economic cooperation.
  • Maritime Trade and Fisheries Issues:Although the Bay of Bengal is rich in resources and has a significant fishing population, BIMSTEC members have not developed a cohesive maritime trade ecosystem. 
  • Issues such as the frequent detention of fishermen crossing territorial borders have also strained relations.
  • Focus on Bilateralism: According to C. Raja Mohan there is a tendency among member countries to prioritise bilateral relations over multilateral cooperation, which undermines the collective potential of BIMSTEC.
  • Non-Tariff Barriers:Non-tariff barriers, including regulatory measures and customs procedures, continue to pose challenges to trade, limiting the effectiveness of any existing agreements.
  • Focus on Ideology over Pragmatism: According to C. Raja Mohan, South Asian nations often prioritise ideological considerations over practical economic benefits, leading to missed opportunities for collaboration and growth.
  • Geopolitical Dynamics:The geopolitical landscape, including the influence of larger powers and regional rivalries, can complicate cooperation efforts. 
  • The ongoing political tensions in Bangladesh with the fall of Sheikh Hasina Government.
  • The ongoing tensions in Myanmar and the Rohingya crisis have also affected relations among member states.

 

Way Forward

  • Member nations consider trade in local currencies to balance out trade imbalances.
  • Begin with a PTA (preferential trade agreement) if not a full-blown FTA.
  • Enhancing Market Access: Better connectivity provides businesses with access to larger markets, allowing them to expand their reach and tap into new opportunities.
  • Promote a Blue Economy: Develop a Bay of Bengal blue economy partnership focusing on sustainable resource management and environmental protection.
  • Need for Enhanced Connectivity:Enhancing connectivity among member states is vital for boosting economic integration. 
  • Improved transport and communication links can facilitate trade, reduce costs, and foster cooperation, leading to increased regional economic growth.
  • Focus on Strategic Sectors: A nuanced approach is needed to attract FDI from China in sectors where India needs technological advancements, such as electric vehicles and batteries. 
  • This could help bolster manufacturing capacity and economic integration within the region.
  • Remove non-tariff barriers or trade barriers, and the adoption of international norms on trade facilitation, e-commerce, and connectivity.
  • Areas where cooperation can be increased include better integration of custom borders, computerisation of border controls, and faster clearance of documents for imports and exports.
  • Encouraging Investment: Improved infrastructure can attract foreign and domestic investment by creating a more attractive business environment and reducing logistical challenges.

 

Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post Impact of New Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) Tax Regime
Next Post Bridging the Global Skill Gap by Circular Migration