The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

Navigating Economic Indicators and Policy Implications

  • 0
  • 3066
Font size:
Print

Navigating Economic Indicators and Policy Implications

Context:

The economy shows a paradox of weak consumption growth, sluggish employment, and low core inflation despite strong overall growth, highlighting the need for a deeper analysis of these trends.

 

Economic Indicators and Their Implications:

  • Consumption: Consumption growth is weak, growing at just 4%, half the rate of the overall GDP growth.
    • Household savings are declining and borrowing is rising, indicating that households are not saving more but borrowing to sustain consumption.
      • Household net financial savings was only 5.7% of GDP in 2023-24, below the 7.6% of GDP average in the years before Covid. 
    • Weak consumption is a signal of weak growth rather than high growth with low consumption.
  • Employment: Employment growth is weak despite strong GDP figures.
    • The official employment statistics might present an overly optimistic view, as the actual employment conditions could be more problematic than reported.
  • Weak employment growth reflects broader economic weakness, not strong growth.
  • Core Inflation: Core inflation (excluding food and fuel prices) has fallen at a low level of 3%, despite strong GDP growth.
    • Low core inflation suggests that aggregate demand is weak, indicating that growth may not be as strong as reported.
    • Low core inflation supports the view that growth is modest rather than robust.

 

 

 

Headline and Core inflation:

  • Headline inflation: It Denotes the overall change in the value of all goods within the basket of goods.
  • Core inflation: It is calculated by excluding food and fuel items from the headline inflation figure.
  • Since the prices of fuel and food items tend to fluctuate and create ‘noise’ in inflation computation, core inflation is less volatile than headline inflation.

 

Policy Recommendations:

  • Avoid Tax Cuts: Tax cuts would impact only a small portion of the population i.e top 10-20% tax paying population, and could exacerbate inequality.
  • Moreover, such measures would be inequitable given the K-shaped recovery and the adverse impact on the informal sector.
  • Focus is needed on structural reforms instead of cyclical adjustments.
  • Prioritise Privatisation: Implementing a privatisation strategy could spur investment and modernization in state-owned enterprises.
    • It is unwise for the government to invest more public funds into inefficient public sector undertakings like Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL).
  • Adjust Monetary Policy: With weak growth and low core inflation, reducing interest rates could stimulate demand.
  • Lower rates might lead to a weaker rupee, enhancing export competitiveness.

 

 

K-shaped recovery:

A K-shaped recovery describes a scenario where, after a recession, various sectors of the economy rebound at disparate rates, times, or levels.

 

Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post Floating Solar Photovoltaic (FSPV) Technology
Next Post UN World Population Prospects 2024