The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

Horse Domestication and Mobilisation

  • 0
  • 3048
Font size:
Print

Horse Domestication and Mobilisation

Context:

In a recent Genome analysis of 475 ancient horses and 77 modern ones clarifies timing of horse domestication.

Key Finding Of the Study:

  • It revealed domestication occurred twice, with the first attempt being unsuccessful.
    • The first time being a dead end and traced the rise of horse-based mobility to around 2200 BC in Eurasia, centuries later than previously thought.
  • Initial domestication occurred in Central Asia, specifically northern Kazakhstan, by the Botai culture around 5,500 years ago.
    • focused on obtaining meat and milk rather than mobility and did not spread widely.
  • The second equine bloodline was domesticated roughly 4,700 years ago in the western Russian steppes.
    • Horse-based mobility across Eurasia emerged about 4,200 years ago, originating from this second domestication event.
    • All modern domestic horses trace their origins to this second domestication.

Shift in Breeding Practices:

  • Genomic evidence indicates a shift in breeding practices to meet the demand for horses during this period.
  • People doubled horse production capacity by halving the time between generations, from eight years to four.
  • Close-kin mating was detected from this time onward, likely enforced by breeders to select for desired traits like increased docility.

Impact of Horse-Based Mobility and Human Migrations:

  • It accelerated communication and trade across Europe and Asia.
  • Chariots and cavalry transformed warfare, influencing the rise and fall of empires.
  • This era marked increased global interactions, lasting until the late 19th century.
  • Massive migrations around 3000 BCE spread Indo-European languages across Eurasia.
  • Recent studies challenge the belief that these migrations occurred on horseback, indicating horses did not accompany early human movements.

evolution of horses over the years.

Overview of Horse Domestication and Migration in Indian Subcontinent:

  • Horses are not native to the Indian subcontinent.
  • Horses were imported from northwestern regions: Arabia, Central Asia, and Eurasia.
  • Indian kings were called Gajapati (elephant lords) due to their export of elephants.
    • India exported elephants and imported horses.
  • Mythical Origins: 
    • Ramayana and Mahabharata: Horses emerged from the ocean.
    • Shalihotra literature: Horses were originally winged celestial creatures, lost wings to serve Indra.
    • Kings in northwest India (Gandhara and Madra) were called Ashwapati (horse lords) in the Ramayana and Mahabharata.
  • Harappan Civilization and Horses:
    • Limited evidence of horses from the Harappan (Indus Valley) civilization.
    • Few remains, such as terracotta toys, figurines, teeth, and bone fragments, suggest sparse availability or domestication until the late Harappan phase.
    • Recent excavations at Sanauli (2000–1800 BCE) revealed chariots that might have been pulled by horses.
  • Aryan Invasion Theory:
    • The theory posits that Indo-Aryans brought horses to India around 1500 BCE, using them for transport and warfare.
    • The decline of the Harappan civilization coincided with Indo-Aryan migrations into the subcontinent.
    • The Indo-Aryans’ use of horse-drawn chariots with spoked wheels was crucial in their spread across north India.
  • Cultural Significance of Horses:
    • The Rig Veda, one of the oldest Hindu texts, mentions horses 215 times, underscoring their importance.
    • Horses were integral to Vedic martial ethos, depicted in hymns and used in ceremonies like the ashvamedha yajna (horse sacrifice).
      • The ashvamedha yajna was a royal ceremony ensuring the sanctity of a king’s rule, involving elaborate rituals and the sacrifice of a specially selected horse.
      • The horse was believed to ascend to heaven, bringing blessings and expiating the king’s sins.
  • Evolution of Horse Use:
    • Horses and chariots were prominent on battlefields until the beginning of the Common Era.
    • By the seventh century, cavalry replaced chariots, becoming a vital part of India’s military, notably during the Mauryan Empire (early fourth to late second century BCE).

 

The Controversial Presence of Horses in the Indus-Sarasvati Civilization:

  • Physical Evidence:
    • Horse remains reported from Neolithic sites like Kodekal and Hallur, and late Harappan sites like Mohenjo-daro, Ropar, Harappa, Lothal, and others.
    • A. K. Sharma identified horse remains at Surkotada, confirmed by Sándor Bökönyi as true, domesticated horses.
    • Similar findings of horse remains have been reported at sites like Shikarpur, Kuntasi, Kalibangan, and the Chambal Valley.
    • Early dates for horse remains, such as at Hallur (1500-1300 BCE), contradict the theory that horses were brought by Aryans around 1500 BCE.
  • Depictions and Additional Evidence:
    • Horse figurines found at Mohenjo-daro and Lothal, as well as rock art, indicate the presence of horses in Harappan culture.
    • The spoked wheel, once thought to be introduced by Aryans, has been found in Harappan sites like Banawali, Rakhigarhi, Kuntasi, Lothal, and Bhirrana.
  • Conclusion:
    • The presence of horse remains and depictions in Harappan sites weakens the argument that horses and related innovations were introduced solely by Aryan invaders.
    • The reliance on negative evidence and outdated colonial interpretations has skewed the understanding of the Harappan civilization’s relationship with horses.

 

Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post Rules Governing Civil Servants
Next Post KIRTI Programme