The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

India’s First Digital Court for Cheque Bounce Cases

  • 0
  • 3059
Font size:
Print

India’s First Digital Court for Cheque Bounce Cases

Context:

India’s first digital court dedicated to handling cheque bounce cases, named 24*7 ONCOURTS, was inaugurated recently in Kollam (Kerala).

 

More on News:

  • The initiative will facilitate online court procedures from the initial filing stage through to case registration, admission, appearances, hearings, and the issuance of judgments and orders. 
  • If successful, additional ONCOURTS may be set up across the state.
  • Cheque-bouncing cases make up approximately 10% of all cases, and automating these processes will boost productivity and reduce backlog. 

 

Best Practices Adopted in the Indian Judiciary

Technological Advancements:

      • eCourts Project: This ambitious project aims to modernize the Indian judiciary through the use of technology. It involves the digitization of court records, online case filing, and the use of video conferencing for hearings.
      • National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG): The NJDG is a centralized database that provides real-time information on case status, court schedules, and other judicial data.
      • Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): The judiciary has encouraged the use of ODR platforms to resolve disputes efficiently and cost-effectively, particularly in minor cases.

 

Case Management Reforms:

      • Fast Track Courts: These specialized courts are established to expedite the disposal of specific types of cases, such as those involving women, children, and environmental matters.
      • Lok Adalats: These informal dispute resolution forums are held periodically to settle disputes amicably.
      • Case Flow Management: The judiciary has implemented case flow management systems to monitor the progress of cases and identify bottlenecks in the judicial process.

 

Judicial Reforms:

      • Public Interest Litigation (PIL): PILs allow individuals or groups to raise issues of public importance in court, even if they are not directly affected. This has empowered citizens to hold the government accountable and address social and environmental concerns.
      • Judicial Accountability: The judiciary is accountable through measures such as judicial review, impeachment proceedings, and public scrutiny.
      • Training and Capacity Building: The judiciary has invested in training and capacity-building programs for judges and court staff to improve their knowledge and skills.

 

Access to Justice:

      • Legal Aid: The judiciary has established legal aid schemes to provide free legal assistance to marginalized and disadvantaged groups.
      • Language Accessibility: The judiciary has taken steps to ensure that court proceedings are conducted in languages that are understandable to the litigants.

 

Need for digitisation of Judiciary:

Enhanced Efficiency and Speed:

  • Reduction of Delays: Digitization can significantly reduce delays in the judicial process by streamlining paperwork, improving case tracking, and facilitating online communication between parties and the court.
  • Improved Case Management: Digital systems can help in better case management, ensuring that cases are assigned to appropriate judges, deadlines are met, and hearings are scheduled efficiently.
  • The Supreme Court’s ruling in State of Uttar Pradesh vs Abhay Raj Singh highlighted the consequences of missing court records, which can lead to wrongful acquittals. This case underscores the importance of digitization in maintaining accurate and accessible records to prevent legal injustices.

 

Improved Transparency and Accountability:

      • Public Access: Digitization can provide public access to court records and proceedings, increasing transparency and accountability.
      • Prevention of Corruption: Digital systems can help to reduce corruption by minimising human intervention and making it more difficult to manipulate records.

 

Enhanced Accessibility:

      • Remote Access: Digital platforms can allow litigants to access court services remotely, reducing the need for physical presence and making the judiciary more accessible to people in remote areas.
      • Language Accessibility: Digitization can facilitate the use of multiple languages in court proceedings, making the judiciary more inclusive.

 

Cost Reduction:

      • Paperless Courts: Digitization can reduce the costs associated with paper-based recordkeeping and storage.
      • Reduced Travel: Online court proceedings can reduce the need for litigants and witnesses to travel long distances, saving time and money.

 

Better Data Analysis and Decision-Making:

      • Data-Driven Insights: Digitization can generate valuable data on case trends, judicial performance, and other relevant metrics. This data can be used to inform policy decisions and improve the overall efficiency of the judiciary.

 

Integration with Other Government Services:

      • Interoperability: A digitized judiciary can be integrated with other government services, such as police databases and revenue departments, facilitating smoother coordination and information sharing.

 

Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post Competition Commission of India (CCI)
Next Post Regionalisation of Legal Education System and Judiciary in India