The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

Enemy Agents Ordinance, 2005

  • 0
  • 3039
Font size:
Print

Enemy Agents Ordinance, 2005

Context :

Jammu and Kashmir Director General of Police (DGP)  on Sunday said those found assisting militants in J&K should be tried by investigating agencies under the Enemy Agents Ordinance, 2005.

  • The law is more stringent than the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and has the punishment of either a life term or a death sentence.

 

Historical Background of the law 

  • The J&K Enemy Agents Ordinance was first issued in 1917 by the then Dogra Maharaja of J&K. 
  • It is referred to as an ‘ordinance’ since laws made during the Dogra rule were called ordinances.
  • After Partition in 1947, the ordinance was incorporated as a law in the erstwhile state and was also amended.
  • Post abrogation of article 370 security laws such as Enemy Agents Ordinance remained in J&K.

 

Salient features 

Who is an enemy agent ?

  • Enemy agent is one who is an enemy agent or, with an intent to aid the enemy, conspires with any other person to impede the Indian force .

Punishment 

  • Shall be punishable with death or rigorous imprisonment for life .

Trial under the law 

  • It is conducted by a special judge who is appointed by the government in consultation with the High Court.
  • Accused cannot engage a lawyer to defend herself unless permitted by the court.

 

Appeal against the decision 

  • There is no provision for appeal against the verdict,
  • The decision of the special judge can only be reviewed by a person chosen by the Government from the judges of the High Court and the decision of that person shall be final.

Ban on disclosure or publication of the case  – Anyone tried for publication of case shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

 

Impact of the law 

  • Scores of Kashmiris have been tried and sentenced under the Enemy Agents Ordinance. 
  • Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front founder Maqbool Bhat, who was hanged in Tihar Jail in 1984, was charged under the ordinance.

 

Concerns 

  • Hampers Natural justice & Human right : Provisions such as no appeal against judgement hampers natural justice principle.
  • Prone to misuse as there is a bar on disclosure of publication. 
  • Not in sync with whole of India : Post Article 370 Abrogation there should be uniformity in the laws of mainland India & J&K.
  • Outdated law : With abrogation of Article 370 security situations have improved ,also judiciary has become vibrant thus such strict laws can be done away with.

 

Way Forwards

  • After ten people were killed and scores of others injured in four terror incidents between June 9 and 12 in Reasi, Doda, and Kathua districts of Jammu there is need for stringent laws like Enemy Agents Ordinance, 2005.

 

Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post Tirupati laddus Controversy: Ethical and Legal Implications
Next Post Life Expectancy Decline in India Due to Covid-19