Enemy Agents Ordinance, 2005

  • 0
  • 3089
Font size:
Print

Enemy Agents Ordinance, 2005

Context :

Jammu and Kashmir Director General of Police (DGP)  on Sunday said those found assisting militants in J&K should be tried by investigating agencies under the Enemy Agents Ordinance, 2005.

  • The law is more stringent than the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and has the punishment of either a life term or a death sentence.

 

Historical Background of the law 

  • The J&K Enemy Agents Ordinance was first issued in 1917 by the then Dogra Maharaja of J&K. 
  • It is referred to as an ‘ordinance’ since laws made during the Dogra rule were called ordinances.
  • After Partition in 1947, the ordinance was incorporated as a law in the erstwhile state and was also amended.
  • Post abrogation of article 370 security laws such as Enemy Agents Ordinance remained in J&K.

 

Salient features 

Who is an enemy agent ?

  • Enemy agent is one who is an enemy agent or, with an intent to aid the enemy, conspires with any other person to impede the Indian force .

Punishment 

  • Shall be punishable with death or rigorous imprisonment for life .

Trial under the law 

  • It is conducted by a special judge who is appointed by the government in consultation with the High Court.
  • Accused cannot engage a lawyer to defend herself unless permitted by the court.

 

Appeal against the decision 

  • There is no provision for appeal against the verdict,
  • The decision of the special judge can only be reviewed by a person chosen by the Government from the judges of the High Court and the decision of that person shall be final.

Ban on disclosure or publication of the case  – Anyone tried for publication of case shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

 

Impact of the law 

  • Scores of Kashmiris have been tried and sentenced under the Enemy Agents Ordinance. 
  • Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front founder Maqbool Bhat, who was hanged in Tihar Jail in 1984, was charged under the ordinance.

 

Concerns 

  • Hampers Natural justice & Human right : Provisions such as no appeal against judgement hampers natural justice principle.
  • Prone to misuse as there is a bar on disclosure of publication. 
  • Not in sync with whole of India : Post Article 370 Abrogation there should be uniformity in the laws of mainland India & J&K.
  • Outdated law : With abrogation of Article 370 security situations have improved ,also judiciary has become vibrant thus such strict laws can be done away with.

 

Way Forwards

  • After ten people were killed and scores of others injured in four terror incidents between June 9 and 12 in Reasi, Doda, and Kathua districts of Jammu there is need for stringent laws like Enemy Agents Ordinance, 2005.

 

Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Kerala Assembly’s demand to rename state as “Keralam’
Next Post Amended Surrogacy Leave Rules for Government Employees.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x