The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

OTT services regulated under Telecommunication Act

  • 0
  • 3027
Font size:
Print

OTT services regulated under Telecommunication Act

Context:

A conflict has emerged between telecom service providers  and OTT platform companies over the interpretation of what constitutes a telecommunication service under India’s new Telecommunication Act, 2023. 

 

More in News:

  • Telecom operators, represented by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), argue that over-the-top (OTT) communication platforms like WhatsApp and Google Meet should be classified as access services and therefore fall under the new Telecommunication Act 2023  jurisdiction. 
  • This would require these platforms to be subject to a licensing framework similar to that of telecom firms. 
  • However, government officials have previously disputed this interpretation, and tech companies are resisting the push for such regulation.

Constitutional Implications:

  • Article 14Equality Before the Law: The principle of “same service, same rule” for regulating OTT services seeks to create a level playing field with telecom service providers (TSPs).
  • However, this could be contested under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which ensures equal treatment under the law, provided the differentiation is not arbitrary or unreasonable.
  • Article 19(1)(g)Right to Practise Any Profession: OTT providers may argue that over-regulation infringes on their right to freely practise their profession, as guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. 
  • However, this right is subject to reasonable restrictions in the public interest.

Arguments For Including OTT in the Telecom Act:

  • Level Playing Field: Telecom operators argue that OTT services like WhatsApp provide similar communication services (calling and messaging) without facing the same regulatory burdens, such as licensing fees and infrastructure costs. 
  • This creates an unfair competitive advantage, and the principle of “same service, same rule” should apply to ensure fairness.
  • Revenue and Investment: Telecom operators invest heavily in network infrastructure and spectrum, which OTT providers do not. 
  • Including OTTs in the regulatory framework could ensure they contribute to the Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) and help offset these costs.
  • National Security and Lawful Interception: Regulating OTT services is seen as necessary for national security, allowing for lawful interception and monitoring by security agencies to prevent misinformation and criminal activities.

 

Arguments Against Including OTT in the Telecom Act:

  • Technological and Operational Differences: OTT services operate at the application layer, while telecom service providers (TSPs) operate at the network layer, making it unjustified to apply the same licensing framework. 
  • OTT providers do not own network infrastructure, unlike TSPs.
  • Impact on Innovation and Growth: Regulating OTTs could stifle innovation and hinder their growth, especially since they are still developing in India. 
  • Over-regulation could slow down the dynamic and rapidly evolving OTT market, which is crucial for digital economy growth.
  • Digital Rights and Privacy Concerns: Regulating OTTs, especially encrypted services like WhatsApp, to allow lawful interception could raise privacy concerns and infringe on digital rights, making it technologically challenging to implement.

 

OTT Communication Service Providers vs. Access Service Providers

ott communication service providers,access service providers.

Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF)

  • It  was established by an Act of Parliament in December 2003(statutory status) through an amendment to the Indian Telegraph Act of 1885.
  • USOF is designed to ensure quality and affordable mobile and digital services in rural and remote areas, promoting equal access to communication and information for socio-economic development.
  • The USOF facilitates non-discriminatory access to mobile and network services, aiming to improve living standards and accelerate socio-economic progress.
  • The fund is headed  by the Administrator, USO Fund, appointed by the Central Government, and operates as an attached office of the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) within the Ministry of Communications.
  • Schemes: BharatNet,Comprehensive Telecom Development plan (CTDP) for North East Region,Providing Mobile services in LWE areas.

Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post MSME bodies urge RBI for SMA-2 stressed loan accounts
RBI’s surplus transfer to the Government
Next Post RBI’s surplus transfer to the Government