Font size:
Print
Fiscal Federalism
Context:
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin alleged that the Union government was withholding funds for the State’s vital projects, accusing the government’s tax policies reduce aggregate financial transfers to States, weakening cooperative federalism.
Cooperative Federalism
Cooperative federalism refers to a concept where various states cooperate with each other and with the centre to achieve the goals of growth, development of the states and the nation e.g. All India Service,GST ,NITI Aayog.
Reduction in financial transfers to states:
- Though the Fourteenth and 15th Finance Commission recommended devolving 42% and 41%of Union Net Tax revenues to States respectively , which is a clean 10 percentage points increase over the 13th Finance Commission’s recommendation.
- The Union government not only reduced the financial transfers to States but also increased its own total revenue to increase its discretionary expenditure.
Reasons for Decrease in Financial transfer to states:
- Statutory financial transfers declined from 48.2% to 35.32% of the gross tax revenue of the Union government due to
- Increase in Revenue from Cess and Surcharge: From 5.9% in 2015-16 to 10.8% in 2023-24.These collections are not shared with states and are used for specific Union government schemes.
- Decline in Grants-in-Aid to States: from ₹1.95 lakh crore in 2015-16 to ₹1.65 lakh crore in 2023-24.
- Centralisation of Public Expenditure/Discretionary Grants:
- Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS):Increased from ₹2.04 lakh crore in 2015-16 to ₹4.76 lakh crore in 2023-24.
- Central Sector Schemes (CSec):Increased from ₹5.21 lakh crore in 2015-16 to ₹14.68 lakh crore in 2023-24.
Impact of lower fiscal transfer:
- Impact on Cooperative Federalism:Thus the centre retains more than 50% of gross tax revenue leading to lower fiscal space for state governments.
- The discretionary expenditures of the Union government are not being routed through the States’ Budgets, and, therefore, can impact different States in different ways.
- Centrally Sponsored Scheme shared schemes enable States with sufficient funds to secure matching grants, while poorer States must borrow to participate, increasing their liabilities. This exacerbates inter-State financial inequality, as wealthier States leverage Union finances, deepening the fiscal disparity.
- The financial transfers through CSS and C Sec Schemes are non-statutory transfers as they are based on neither any legal provisions nor any formula determined by the Finance Commission.
- Non-statutory grants are tied grants, i.e., they have to be spent on specific schemes for which the grants are allocated. This reduces the freedom of States in conducting public expenditure.
Way forward:
- Strengthening Finance Commission Mandate:Periodic review and adjustment of revenue-sharing formulas to reflect economic changes.
- Reforming Centrally Sponsored Schemes:Rationalise CSS to provide states with greater flexibility in fund utilisation.
- Enhancing State Revenue Capacities.