Gender Budgeting in Union Budget 2025-26 

  • 0
  • 3009
Font size:
Print

Gender Budgeting in Union Budget 2025-26 

Context:

As India marks two decades of gender budgeting, the 2025-26 Union Budget sets an ambitious vision for women-led development, aligning with the broader goal of Viksit Bharat 2047. 

Understanding Gender Budgeting

  • India’s Gender Budgeting, introduced in 2005-06, is a tool for gender mainstreaming that applies a gender lens to policy and budgetary processes. 
  • Gender Budgeting is a fiscal tool that assesses government spending through a gender lens to promote gender equality.
  • It is not a separate budget but rather an approach to assessing the impact of government policies and expenditures on women and girls. 
  • The Gender Budget Statement is divided into two parts:
    • Part A: Covers 100% women-specific schemes.
    • Part B: Includes pro-women schemes where at least 30% of the allocation benefits women.
    • Part C schemes with less than 30% provisioning for women. 
  • The PM Kisan scheme in the agriculture sector has been reported in part C with an outlay of ₹15,000 crore.

Provisions in Budget 2025-26 for Women-Led Development

  • The Budget prioritises increasing the Female Labor Force Participation Rate (FLFPR) to 70%.
  • Women’s employment, education, health, and security remain key focus areas.
  • Specific gender-responsive allocations have been made in agriculture, entrepreneurship, and rural development.

Key Schemes and Initiatives Related to Gender Budgeting

  • Gender Budgeting in Flagship Schemes 
    • MGNREGS: Allocation increased to INR 40,000 crore; 57.8% of workers are women.
    • PMAY-Urban & Rural: Increased funding, but concerns remain about women’s property ownership.
    • National Mission on Education through ICT (NMEICT): 100% gender allocation but funding reduced.
    • Mission Shakti: Focuses on women’s safety and empowerment with increased allocations.
  • Initiatives for Employment and First-Time Entrepreneurship
    • PM Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP): Budget cut from INR 1,012.50 crore to INR 862.50 crore.
    • Women Entrepreneurship Initiative: Provides term loans up to INR 2 crore over the next five years.
    • Agriculture & Rural Workforce: 80% of women work in agriculture, but only 13.9% own land; Krishonnati Yojana lacks specific gender provisions.
  • Initiatives for Education
    • STEM Inclusion: Women make up 40% of STEM graduates but only 14% in STEM employment.
    • Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan: Allocation increased to INR 12,375 crore.
    • PM SHRI Schools Scheme: Funding increased to INR 2,250 crore.
    • Digital Gender Divide: NMEICT allocation reduced from INR 551.25 crore to INR 229.25 crore.
  • Initiatives for Housing
    • PMAY-Urban: Budget raised from INR 15,170 crore to INR 23,294 crore.
    • PMAY-Rural (PMAY-G): Increased from INR 32,500 crore to INR 54,832 crore.
    • Women’s Ownership: 73% of PMAY-G houses registered under women’s names, but gaps remain.
  • Initiatives for Health
    • Saksham Anganwadi and Poshan 2.0: Budget stagnates at INR 450.98 crore.
    • Ayushman Bharat (PMJAY): Allocation increased to INR 4,482.90 crore but only 30% designated for women.
    • Menstrual Hygiene Scheme: Placed in Part B, suggesting only partial funding benefits women.
    • Matru Vandana Yojana: INR 6,000 maternity benefit remains unchanged since 2013.
    • Anganwadi Workers’ Pay: Remains inadequate, highlighting neglect of women’s health workers.
  • Initiatives for Safety and Security
    • Nirbhaya Fund: Increased from INR 180 crore to INR 200 crore, but 74% of allocated funds remain unspent.
    • Mission Shakti – Sambal & Samarthya:
      • Sambal (Safety Measures): INR 629 crore allocation unchanged from 2023-24.
      • Samarthya (Empowerment): Budget increased from INR 953.74 crore to INR 2,396 crore.
    • Public Transport Safety: No major investments; 91% of urban women report transport insecurity.

 

Challenges in Gender Budgeting

  • Misallocation & Underutilisation: Many schemes are placed under Part B, meaning only a portion directly benefits women.
  • Insufficient Funding for Key Areas: Reductions in PMEGP and NMEICT undermine entrepreneurship and digital literacy.
  • Inflated Gender Budget Figures: Moving schemes like PMAY-Urban to Part A distorts actual gender-focused spending.
  • Lack of Gender-Disaggregated Data: Poor tracking of impact on women-specific programs.
  • Neglect of Care Economy: Unpaid care work, which accounts for 15-17% of GDP, remains unaddressed.

 

Way Forward for Strengthening Gender-Responsive Budgeting

  • Implementing  Gender Budgeting Act:  Institutionalise gender-based budgeting across all ministries and states.
  • Developing  Human Capital:  Increase investments in education, health, and skill development.
  • Supporting  Women Entrepreneurs:  Expand credit access, incubation programs, and financial literacy initiatives.
  • Addressing Unpaid Care Work:  Introduce paid leave policies, care service subsidies, and caregiver training.
  • Climate Resilience for Women: Target funding to women in agriculture, climate adaptation, and disaster relief
Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post India’s New Research Initiatives and Innovations
Next Post Union Budget Boosts India's Shipping Industry
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x