big bass splash
султан казино

Horse Domestication and Mobilisation

  • 0
  • 4024
Font size:
Print

Horse Domestication and Mobilisation

Context:

In a recent Genome analysis of 475 ancient horses and 77 modern ones clarifies timing of horse domestication.

Key Finding Of the Study:

  • It revealed domestication occurred twice, with the first attempt being unsuccessful.
    • The first time being a dead end and traced the rise of horse-based mobility to around 2200 BC in Eurasia, centuries later than previously thought.
  • Initial domestication occurred in Central Asia, specifically northern Kazakhstan, by the Botai culture around 5,500 years ago.
    • focused on obtaining meat and milk rather than mobility and did not spread widely.
  • The second equine bloodline was domesticated roughly 4,700 years ago in the western Russian steppes.
    • Horse-based mobility across Eurasia emerged about 4,200 years ago, originating from this second domestication event.
    • All modern domestic horses trace their origins to this second domestication.

Shift in Breeding Practices:

  • Genomic evidence indicates a shift in breeding practices to meet the demand for horses during this period.
  • People doubled horse production capacity by halving the time between generations, from eight years to four.
  • Close-kin mating was detected from this time onward, likely enforced by breeders to select for desired traits like increased docility.

Impact of Horse-Based Mobility and Human Migrations:

  • It accelerated communication and trade across Europe and Asia.
  • Chariots and cavalry transformed warfare, influencing the rise and fall of empires.
  • This era marked increased global interactions, lasting until the late 19th century.
  • Massive migrations around 3000 BCE spread Indo-European languages across Eurasia.
  • Recent studies challenge the belief that these migrations occurred on horseback, indicating horses did not accompany early human movements.

Overview of Horse Domestication and Migration in Indian Subcontinent:

  • Horses are not native to the Indian subcontinent.
  • Horses were imported from northwestern regions: Arabia, Central Asia, and Eurasia.
  • Indian kings were called Gajapati (elephant lords) due to their export of elephants.
    • India exported elephants and imported horses.
  • Mythical Origins: 
    • Ramayana and Mahabharata: Horses emerged from the ocean.
    • Shalihotra literature: Horses were originally winged celestial creatures, lost wings to serve Indra.
    • Kings in northwest India (Gandhara and Madra) were called Ashwapati (horse lords) in the Ramayana and Mahabharata.
  • Harappan Civilization and Horses:
    • Limited evidence of horses from the Harappan (Indus Valley) civilization.
    • Few remains, such as terracotta toys, figurines, teeth, and bone fragments, suggest sparse availability or domestication until the late Harappan phase.
    • Recent excavations at Sanauli (2000–1800 BCE) revealed chariots that might have been pulled by horses.
  • Aryan Invasion Theory:
    • The theory posits that Indo-Aryans brought horses to India around 1500 BCE, using them for transport and warfare.
    • The decline of the Harappan civilization coincided with Indo-Aryan migrations into the subcontinent.
    • The Indo-Aryans’ use of horse-drawn chariots with spoked wheels was crucial in their spread across north India.
  • Cultural Significance of Horses:
    • The Rig Veda, one of the oldest Hindu texts, mentions horses 215 times, underscoring their importance.
    • Horses were integral to Vedic martial ethos, depicted in hymns and used in ceremonies like the ashvamedha yajna (horse sacrifice).
      • The ashvamedha yajna was a royal ceremony ensuring the sanctity of a king’s rule, involving elaborate rituals and the sacrifice of a specially selected horse.
      • The horse was believed to ascend to heaven, bringing blessings and expiating the king’s sins.
  • Evolution of Horse Use:
    • Horses and chariots were prominent on battlefields until the beginning of the Common Era.
    • By the seventh century, cavalry replaced chariots, becoming a vital part of India’s military, notably during the Mauryan Empire (early fourth to late second century BCE).

 

The Controversial Presence of Horses in the Indus-Sarasvati Civilization:

  • Physical Evidence:
    • Horse remains reported from Neolithic sites like Kodekal and Hallur, and late Harappan sites like Mohenjo-daro, Ropar, Harappa, Lothal, and others.
    • A. K. Sharma identified horse remains at Surkotada, confirmed by Sándor Bökönyi as true, domesticated horses.
    • Similar findings of horse remains have been reported at sites like Shikarpur, Kuntasi, Kalibangan, and the Chambal Valley.
    • Early dates for horse remains, such as at Hallur (1500-1300 BCE), contradict the theory that horses were brought by Aryans around 1500 BCE.
  • Depictions and Additional Evidence:
    • Horse figurines found at Mohenjo-daro and Lothal, as well as rock art, indicate the presence of horses in Harappan culture.
    • The spoked wheel, once thought to be introduced by Aryans, has been found in Harappan sites like Banawali, Rakhigarhi, Kuntasi, Lothal, and Bhirrana.
  • Conclusion:
    • The presence of horse remains and depictions in Harappan sites weakens the argument that horses and related innovations were introduced solely by Aryan invaders.
    • The reliance on negative evidence and outdated colonial interpretations has skewed the understanding of the Harappan civilization’s relationship with horses.

 

Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post UNCTAD Report on Public Debt
Next Post Climate Crisis: Escalating Threats & Urgent Solutions
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x