Font size:
Print
Meta and Fact-Checking
Context:
Meta is undergoing a significant transformation in its approach to fact-checking, transitioning from an independent third-party program to a Community Notes model.
More on News
- This shift, announced by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, aims to empower users to add context and facts directly beneath posts, moving away from reliance on external fact-checkers.
Changes in Fact-Checking Norms
- Since its inception in 2016, Meta’s independent fact-checking initiative was designed to combat misinformation on platforms like Facebook and Instagram.
- This program involved certified fact-checkers from the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) who evaluated the accuracy of posts.
- However, Meta has now decided to discontinue this program, citing concerns over perceived biases among fact-checkers and excessive censorship of legitimate discourse.
- The new Community Notes system will allow users to collaboratively flag and contextualise potentially misleading content, fostering a more decentralised approach to information verification.
Reasons for the Shift
- Bias Concerns: The company claims that independent fact-checkers have shown biases in their evaluations, limiting free expression and political debate.
- Censorship Issues: There are assertions that the previous system overly restricted discussions on sensitive topics, such as immigration and gender identity.
- User Empowerment: By enabling users to contribute context, Meta aims to create a more inclusive environment for discourse while focusing enforcement on severe violations only.
Impact on India
- Currently, Meta has not implemented the Community Notes model in India.
- Experts note that while this shift does not violate Indian laws regarding misinformation, it raises concerns about the future of local fact-checking organisations that depend on funding from Meta.
- The change could jeopardise jobs and financial stability for many small fact-checking entities in India that rely heavily on partnerships with Meta for their operations.
Legal Context and Global Perspectives
- Fact Check Unit in India & SC’s Ruling: The Supreme Court of India has previously ruled against certain governmental measures aimed at regulating misinformation, emphasising constitutional rights over censorship.
- Misinformation vs Disinformation: Misinformation refers to false or misleading information spread without harmful intent, while disinformation involves deliberate falsehoods aimed at deception.
- Misinformation Law in Turkiye: Turkiye has enacted laws targeting misinformation that impose penalties on those spreading false information online, reflecting a stringent approach compared to Meta’s new model.
- Rabat Plan of Action: This international framework emphasises the importance of freedom of expression while addressing hate speech and misinformation, advocating for balanced approaches that protect both rights and public safety.
As Meta navigates these changes, the effectiveness of the Community Notes model will be closely scrutinised, particularly regarding its impact on misinformation and the quality of discourse across its platforms.
