Strategic Priorities Reflected in India’s MEA Budget 2025-26

  • 0
  • 3036
Font size:
Print

Strategic Priorities Reflected in India’s MEA Budget 2025-26

Context:

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) plays a pivotal role in implementing India’s foreign policy. MEA’s budget has increased by 67% from 2014 to 2025 but its percentage share in the Union Budget has declined from 0.8% to 0.4%

Key Priority Areas in MEA Budget

  • Neighbourhood First: Country-wise Allocation
    • Bhutan: Rs 2,150 crore (largest recipient, 39.2% of total aid) – for hydropower, roads, and infrastructure.
    • Maldives: Rs 600 crore (increase from Rs 470 crore) – reflecting efforts to counter Chinese influence.
    • Sri Lanka: Rs 300 crore – supporting economic recovery.
    • Nepal: Rs 700 crore – consistent aid allocation.
    • Bangladesh: Rs 120 crore – no change despite political shifts.
    • Myanmar: Rs 350 crore (decrease from Rs 400 crore) – due to political instability.
    • Afghanistan: Rs 100 crore (reduced from Rs 200 crore) – reflecting a cautious approach towards the Taliban regime.

  • Strengthening Strategic Connectivity
    • Chabahar Port (Iran): Rs 100 crore for regional trade and connectivity.
    • Kaladan Multimodal Project (Myanmar): Continued funding to strengthen India’s Act East Policy.
    • BBIN Electricity Trade (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal): Increased allocation to enhance regional energy security.
    • India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway: Focus on better trade connectivity.

  • Discretionary Expenditures
    • Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation (ITEC): Rs 16,375 crore – for capacity building, training programs, and grassroots development.
    • Special Diplomatic Expenditures: Rs 24,900 crore – for bilateral relations and global perception management.
    • Disaster Relief Allocation: Increased from Rs 60 crore to Rs 64 crore – for global humanitarian assistance.

Breakdown of MEA Budget 2025-26

  • Total Budget: Rs 20,516 crore
  • Foreign Aid Allocation: Rs 5,483 crore (down from Rs 5,806 crore in 2024-25)
  • Overseas Development Partnerships: Rs 6,750 crore (33% of total MEA budget)
  • Discretionary Spending (ITEC and Special Diplomatic Expenditures): Rs 24,900 crore & Rs 16,375 crore
  • Chabahar Port Allocation: Rs 100 crore (same as last year)
  • In 2025-26, the MEA was allocated Rs 20,516 crore, a 7.3% decrease from the previous year’s projection.
  • The decline is partly due to the absence of Indian Exim Bank sovereign guarantees, which led to higher spending in 2023-24 and 2024-25.

MEA Budget in Global Context

  • India’s diplomatic budget remains relatively small compared to major global powers.
  • India has only 850 IFS officers for 193 embassies and consulates, whereas the US (1000+), China (7000+), and UK (1200+) have much larger diplomatic corps.
  • India’s annual recruitment of 32-35 officers is insufficient to meet global diplomatic demands.

Geopolitical Objectives Behind MEA Spending

  • Countering China’s Influence:
    • Increased aid to Maldives as part of a diplomatic reset.
    • Sustained investments in Bhutan and Nepal to maintain strategic influence.
  • Regional Security:
    • Aid to Sri Lanka and Myanmar ensures stability in the Indian Ocean region.
    • Reduced aid to Afghanistan aligns with a pragmatic approach to the Taliban regime.
  • Economic Diplomacy: Funding for Chabahar Port and BBIN power trade boosts India’s regional trade leadership.
  • Act East and Extended Neighbourhood Strategy: Myanmar projects and Trilateral Highway align with India’s Act East Policy.
  • Africa and Latin America Engagement:
    • Increased aid to Africa (Rs 225 crore from Rs 200 crore) signals India’s global south leadership aspirations.
    • Reduced aid to Latin America suggests a more region-specific approach.

Shortfalls in MEA Budget Allocation

  • Institutional Capacity Constraints:
    • India’s diplomatic corps remains understaffed (850 officers managing 193 missions).
    • MEA’s training budget decreased by 11.4% year-on-year, impacting diplomatic effectiveness.
  • Limited Investment in Emerging Domains:
    • Lack of dedicated funding for critical technologies, AI, and cyber diplomacy.
    • No structured plan for expanding India’s role in global digital infrastructure (DPI).
  • Reduced Aid to Afghanistan & Myanmar: May limit India’s strategic leverage in these conflict-prone regions.

Steps to Address Budget Shortfalls

  • Lateral Hiring:
    • Expand IFS recruitment to 100+ annually.
    • Integrate defence personnel and international relations experts for specialized diplomacy.
  • Capacity Building for Critical Technologies:
    • Establish a dedicated AI and cyber diplomacy desk.
    • Train diplomats in technology-driven foreign policy.
  • Strategic Resource Allocation:
    • Increase funding for MEA training programs.
    • Expand India’s footprint in digital governance and DPI leadership.
Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Human-Elephant Conflict Study 
Next Post Medical Device Safety
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x