The Study By Manikant Singh
Search

The Hidden Risks of Gene-Editing Pesticides

  • 0
  • 3062
Font size:
Print

The Hidden Risks of Gene-Editing Pesticides

Context:

A recent study raises significant concerns about genetic pesticide safety, particularly regarding their potential impact on non-target organisms (NTOs) in outdoor farming environments.

 

More on News:

  • Scientists from Brazil, New Zealand, and Norway, investigate the unintended effects of genetic pesticides on various species in farming environments.
  • The study involved analysing 18 species, including humans, farm animals (cattle, chickens), insects (pollinators), earthworms, fungi, and crops such as maize, cotton, and soybean.

 

Genetic Pesticides

  • As agricultural technologies advance, new tools promise to be more environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional chemical pesticides.
  • Unlike conventional pesticides, which can have broad, detrimental effects on the environment, genetic pesticides aim to specifically alter the genes of pests.
  • They are gene-editing techniques used to target crop pests and are touted for their potential to reduce environmental and chemical impacts. 

 

 

Key Highlights:

  • Some regions, including the European Union and New Zealand, are considering deregulating ‘gene modifying’ procedures due to their proposed economic, social, and environmental benefits.
  • The research highlighted that genetic pesticides could unintentionally affect humans, animals, and plants through contact, inhalation, or ingestion which raises concerns about their overall biological impact.
  • The team identified three major pests for potential targeting with outdoor gene-editing pesticides: Western corn rootworm, red flour beetle, and the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotium
  • Using the CRISPR/Cas9 tool in three application scenarios: irrigation water, fumigation or spraying, and direct pellet applications into the soil.
  • Computer predictive modelling revealed that 12 out of 18 species could experience unintended hybridisation.
  • Metabolic enrichment analysis identified 155 enriched metabolic pathways across 12 species, with the majority of impacts observed in the human genome.

 

Impacts:

  • The research found potential impacts on human genomic regions related to cancer and hormone metabolism.
  • In plants and animals, genetic pesticides could disrupt immune responses, essential molecule biosynthesis, and central nervous system functions.

 

Regulatory and Safety Implications:

  • The researchers stress the necessity for new risk assessment frameworks for genetic engineering applications outside laboratory settings.
  • Including genetic pesticides in legal instruments to manage risks associated with emerging contaminants and potential hazards to human and environmental health.

 

Non-Target Organisms (NTOs)

  • NTOs are species that are not intended to be affected by pesticides or genetically modified crops but may be impacted through various environmental interactions. 
  • It is crucial in assessing the ecological consequences of agricultural practices, particularly those involving genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that produce their pesticides, such as Bt crops.

 

Examples:

  • In agriculture: Beneficial insects like bees, ladybugs, and butterflies can be harmed by pesticides meant to control pests.
  • In medicine: Antibiotics can disrupt the beneficial bacteria in the human gut.
  • In environmental conservation: Efforts to control invasive species can sometimes harm native wildlife.

Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Prev Post Species in News: Honey Badger
Next Post H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus Detected in Multiple Bird Species in Antarctica